지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The numerous local administrative influentials(재지관반) of the early days of the Koryo dynasty, were respectively featuring diverse types of internal hierarchy among them according to their locations, but there were certain similarities as well. There were figures addressed as Gan(干) and figures addressed as Daedeungs(大等) at the highest level. The Sagan(沙干) figures seem to have been most prominent among the Gan figures at the time, and Agan(阿干) figures and Daedeung figures are all identified mostly in the Daeeup local units. But the status of the Daedeung figures seem to have varied according to the local unit they were located at, as the Daedeung figures of the Cheongju and Weonju areas are all identified as the highest ranking influentials in the area, when the Daedeung figures of the Chungju and Myeongju area are rather identified as subordinates to the Agan figures in the area. This kind of differences are surmised to be due to the nature of the relationship that those said local units were maintaining with the central government, or the royal family.
At the middle level of the hierarchy. there was the Shirang(侍郞) and Gyeong(卿) figures. These titles were from the administrative habits of the late Shilla dynasty, and they were both used as names of the official posts(官職) and the names of rank designations(官位). Those titles were by themselves indicating the weakening of the administrative power which the traditional Shilla dynasty ranking designations once held. and their(titled figures') absorption into the new political environment which was being designed by the Koryo dynasty in the early days.
The Koryo government was having difficulties establishing full ruling power over the local societies throughout the country, and the results were mirrored in the societal status of the local administrative influentials. At least inside their domains, they were granted political and administrative power almost equal to the power the central officials were granted. In other words, in local areas both the governmental power and the influence of the local influentials were co-existing as equally decisive voices. But at the same time, it was also quite obvious that the power of the local influentials were locally contained, and were allowed to exist and continue only when they agreed to duly recognize the governmental authorities. And as the ruling power of the government continued to be strengthened and the national hierarchy was gradually being established, the local administrative influentials went on to be organized step by step into the national structure(probably during the King Gwangjong's reign). And eventually it led to the representatives of the local influentials being absorbed into as the lowest ranking officials of the national designation system, and the lock down of the fixed number of the high ranking local influentials in their own areas.
The central government assigned local ruling duties to the local influentials, but there were certain rules as well. Actually there were two major political measures utilized in the process. One of the measures was to utilize the local influentials to keep the connections between the central and the local communities. To that end, emissaries dispatched from central visited several local areas and supervised or simply took charge of certain matters, or members from the local societies were invited(or ordered) to the capital(Giin administration) and were asked to inform the central of the local situations(or simply debriefed). The high ranking officials in the central government were also asked to intervene or be involved in their native local areas(Sashimgwan administration).
The other measure was to utilize the local influentials to keep the connections between the ruling Gun units and the subordinate Hyeon units. As there were limited number of resident officials dispatched from the central to take charge of local ruling, the government had no other choice but to heavily rely upon the established local authorities. For example, the local administrative influentials of the Boju area were also in charge of the influentials of the Jeogahyeon area, and participated in the construction of a certain tablet. There were also members among the influentials who were in charge of matters involving the Buddhist temples, which seems pretty much like a practice inherited from the Shilla dynasty which had Seunggwans stationed at every Gun units.
At the middle level of the hierarchy. there was the Shirang(侍郞) and Gyeong(卿) figures. These titles were from the administrative habits of the late Shilla dynasty, and they were both used as names of the official posts(官職) and the names of rank designations(官位). Those titles were by themselves indicating the weakening of the administrative power which the traditional Shilla dynasty ranking designations once held. and their(titled figures') absorption into the new political environment which was being designed by the Koryo dynasty in the early days.
The Koryo government was having difficulties establishing full ruling power over the local societies throughout the country, and the results were mirrored in the societal status of the local administrative influentials. At least inside their domains, they were granted political and administrative power almost equal to the power the central officials were granted. In other words, in local areas both the governmental power and the influence of the local influentials were co-existing as equally decisive voices. But at the same time, it was also quite obvious that the power of the local influentials were locally contained, and were allowed to exist and continue only when they agreed to duly recognize the governmental authorities. And as the ruling power of the government continued to be strengthened and the national hierarchy was gradually being established, the local administrative influentials went on to be organized step by step into the national structure(probably during the King Gwangjong's reign). And eventually it led to the representatives of the local influentials being absorbed into as the lowest ranking officials of the national designation system, and the lock down of the fixed number of the high ranking local influentials in their own areas.
The central government assigned local ruling duties to the local influentials, but there were certain rules as well. Actually there were two major political measures utilized in the process. One of the measures was to utilize the local influentials to keep the connections between the central and the local communities. To that end, emissaries dispatched from central visited several local areas and supervised or simply took charge of certain matters, or members from the local societies were invited(or ordered) to the capital(Giin administration) and were asked to inform the central of the local situations(or simply debriefed). The high ranking officials in the central government were also asked to intervene or be involved in their native local areas(Sashimgwan administration).
The other measure was to utilize the local influentials to keep the connections between the ruling Gun units and the subordinate Hyeon units. As there were limited number of resident officials dispatched from the central to take charge of local ruling, the government had no other choice but to heavily rely upon the established local authorities. For example, the local administrative influentials of the Boju area were also in charge of the influentials of the Jeogahyeon area, and participated in the construction of a certain tablet. There were also members among the influentials who were in charge of matters involving the Buddhist temples, which seems pretty much like a practice inherited from the Shilla dynasty which had Seunggwans stationed at every Gun units.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 在地官班의 지역성과 정치적 위상
Ⅲ. 在地官班과 지방사회 운영
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1960년대 박정희 정부의 지역통치체계 재편과 ‘유지집단’의 활동 : 충청북도 괴산군 증평읍 사례를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
지역에서 대안적 활동들
로컬리티 인문학
2010 .10
-
[논문] 임진왜란 전후 밀양 재지사족의 동향
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
中國史에서의 중앙과 지방
역사학보
2006 .12
-
중등학교 향토사 교육의 현황과 과제
지방사와 지방문화
2002 .05
-
한국의 ‘전통적’ 邑治 경관의 창출에 관한 試論
역사교육
2009 .12
-
The New Perspective for Korean Local Government
Korea Journal
1999 .06
-
고려시대 공문서의 전달체계와 지방행정운영
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
중국 지방정부의 재정위기(Financial Crisis) 유발행위의 분석
동아인문학
2016 .12
-
지역방송사 통합에 대한 지역민의 수용태도에 관한 연구
주관성 연구
2020 .01
-
지역축제 발전을 위한 지역사회와 지역대학의 역할
비교민속학
2001 .02
-
조선후기 지방 파견 화원들과 그 제도, 그리고 이들의 지방 형상화
동방학지
2008 .01
-
고려 후기~조선 전기 수령 중심 군현 편제의 전개와 연속성
역사비평
2017 .08
-
[논문]1920년대 후반~1930년대 전반기 조선총독부의 면 재정 정비과정과 그 의미
역사와현실
2005 .06
-
조선초기 호장(戶長)의 향촌 지배와 그 변화
한국사연구
2019 .12
-
일제시기 면 단위 유력자의 구성과 지역정치 ―전남 長興郡 蓉山面 사례를 중심으로
대동문화연구
2009 .01
-
고려 무인집권기 지방사회 저항에 대한 연구동향과 과제
통일인문학
2007 .12
-
明淸時代 地域史硏究의 새로운 패러다임에 대한 摸索
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
도시와 국가의 길항관계 및 협력의 논거에 관한 소고 : 정부간 관계에 대한 해석을 토대로
해항도시문화교섭학
2010 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018285595