지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempted to analyze the description of history found in the history textbook, 《Korean Modern and Contemporary History》. Moreover special attention was paid to the period stemming from the opening of the three ports until Japan"s annexation of Korea in 1910. This paper delved into the question of how the history of this period was described, how the minjung was characterized, and what were some of the problems with these descriptions.
The description of the history of this transitional period down the road to modernization comes across as being nationalist tainted with the focus being strongly placed on the nationalist and modernization movements. The use of such a descriptive method runs the risk of presenting a view of history that is based on the thoughts and actions of the various actors that participated in the modernization drive, especially the minjung class, which has been for the most part alienated from history, and as such may be out of synch with actual events. First of all, as the minjung"s thoughts and actions are filled with contradictions, given the fact that they lived in the real world, and mixed with traditions and customs, the minjung cannot be explained using such concepts as modernization and nationalism.
Taking a look at the descriptions found in the history textbook, we find that individuals who possessed ideologies that were deemed to be contrary to the achievement of national and modernization related objectives or who acted differently from the norm are not dealt with at all. Furthermore, the minjungs" thoughts and actions are used only in conjunction with descriptions of the nation. As a result, the individual characteristics of the minjung, their lifestyle, thoughts, and actions are completely excluded from the textbook or described as being part of the nationalist and modernization movements or as individuals who have been enlightened by the elite class despite their inherent limitations.
This method of lumping the minjung within the codes of nation and modernity results in an understanding of history that limits the minjung"s thoughts and actions to the nationalist movement. Such an approach also precludes the possibility of creating a new method of understanding the historical formation of modernization. At this point, it is important to restore the minjung"s history, which had its own individual characteristics quite separate from the codes of nation and modernity, so as to bring about a more diversified understanding of history and to provide more factors with which to reconsider modern and contemporary history.
The description of the history of this transitional period down the road to modernization comes across as being nationalist tainted with the focus being strongly placed on the nationalist and modernization movements. The use of such a descriptive method runs the risk of presenting a view of history that is based on the thoughts and actions of the various actors that participated in the modernization drive, especially the minjung class, which has been for the most part alienated from history, and as such may be out of synch with actual events. First of all, as the minjung"s thoughts and actions are filled with contradictions, given the fact that they lived in the real world, and mixed with traditions and customs, the minjung cannot be explained using such concepts as modernization and nationalism.
Taking a look at the descriptions found in the history textbook, we find that individuals who possessed ideologies that were deemed to be contrary to the achievement of national and modernization related objectives or who acted differently from the norm are not dealt with at all. Furthermore, the minjungs" thoughts and actions are used only in conjunction with descriptions of the nation. As a result, the individual characteristics of the minjung, their lifestyle, thoughts, and actions are completely excluded from the textbook or described as being part of the nationalist and modernization movements or as individuals who have been enlightened by the elite class despite their inherent limitations.
This method of lumping the minjung within the codes of nation and modernity results in an understanding of history that limits the minjung"s thoughts and actions to the nationalist movement. Such an approach also precludes the possibility of creating a new method of understanding the historical formation of modernization. At this point, it is important to restore the minjung"s history, which had its own individual characteristics quite separate from the codes of nation and modernity, so as to bring about a more diversified understanding of history and to provide more factors with which to reconsider modern and contemporary history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 근현대사 교과서의 목차와 서술 내용
Ⅲ. 근대화운동과 민중상
Ⅳ. 민족운동과 민중상
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민중신학에서 생명신학으로 : ‘민중의 사회전기’ 개념을 통해 본 민중신학의 변화 가능성
한국기독교와 역사
2004 .03
-
민중 없는 민중의 교회? : 한국 민중교회 어디로 가고 있나
역사비평
2009 .11
-
민중가요의 역사적 의미에 대하여 - 민중시와의 상관성을 중심으로
비평문학
2005 .11
-
The Characteristics of Korean Minjung Culture
Korea Journal
1987 .11
-
조태일의 민중시 담론 연구 : 「민중언어의 발견」(1972)을 중심으로
열린정신 인문학연구
2019 .04
-
19세기 한국민중운동사의 위상
역사와실학
2007 .06
-
BUDDHIST-CHRISTIAN DIALOGUE TOWARDS THE LIBERATION OF MINJUNG : Particularly Centering Around Minjung Buddhism
신학과세계
1988 .07
-
민중의 한과 탄식, 그 원인과 극복
신학연구
2015 .12
-
민중'에서 '생명'으로 - 한국신학 발전에서의 김지하의 영향
기독교사회윤리
2004 .01
-
민중과 생태환경의 주체화를 위한 신학 : 서남동을 중심으로
신학연구
2012 .06
-
Korean Minjung's Resistance and the Growth of Modern Consciousness from 1876 to 1910 in Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
1970년대 민중시의 주체 구성 : 민중시를 둘러싼 몇 가지 분할에 대하여
한국시학연구
2018 .02
-
민중이라는 빈 공간
신학연구
2019 .12
-
The Minjung Movement and Consciousness during the Late Chosŏn Period
International Journal of Korean History
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018289679