인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
After People's Resistance in June, the Korean Constitutional Law of 6th Republic was made in 1987 through political conference which was composed of the representatives from the majority party as well as the minority party. The Constitutional Law of 6th Republic pursued free democratic society where people's basic rights were guaranteed in maximum. The Constitutional Court system was adopted in Korea to achieve this goal. According to the Constitutional Law of the 6th Republic, the judicial independence and political neutrality was guaranteed by the provisions that prohibited the Justices of the Constitutional Court from doing political activities and guaranteed their status.
Since last year, the fourth Constitutional Court has been in activity. By the way, the 3rd Constitutional Court that existed from September in 2000 to September in 2006 showed remarkable characteristics in the fact that the Court took bold steps in dealing with political cases such as the Presidential Impeachment case and Capital Relocation case. In addition, they say the 3rd Constitutional Court showed, by and large, strong conservative judicial inclination. This paper will analyze and criticize three representative political cases by the 3rd Constitutional Court: Decision to be Constitutional in presidential impeachment case, Decision to be Constitutional in Article 7 of National Security Act case, and Decision to be Unconstitutional in Capital Relocation case and evaluate the three cases in political and social contexts as well. Finally, this paper will explore the characteristics of the judicial inclination of the 3rd Constitutional Court in the perspective of 'the protection of minority's rights.'
Since last year, the fourth Constitutional Court has been in activity. By the way, the 3rd Constitutional Court that existed from September in 2000 to September in 2006 showed remarkable characteristics in the fact that the Court took bold steps in dealing with political cases such as the Presidential Impeachment case and Capital Relocation case. In addition, they say the 3rd Constitutional Court showed, by and large, strong conservative judicial inclination. This paper will analyze and criticize three representative political cases by the 3rd Constitutional Court: Decision to be Constitutional in presidential impeachment case, Decision to be Constitutional in Article 7 of National Security Act case, and Decision to be Unconstitutional in Capital Relocation case and evaluate the three cases in political and social contexts as well. Finally, this paper will explore the characteristics of the judicial inclination of the 3rd Constitutional Court in the perspective of 'the protection of minority's rights.'
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018402995
