지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In modem society, so called information and knowledge society, the importance of intellectual property is more and more increasing. It is not too much to say that the future of country depends on the way how we can protect these intangible property appropriately. The past legal system, which makes much importance of the tangible resources, is therefore to change. According to these new trends we should make a much study of the legal protection for intellectual property.
Nowadays the problems of intellectual property infringement are much discussed. This study is however focussed on the area of civil law e.g. civil remedies, injunctive relief. The criminal study on intellectual property infringement is relatively insufficient. The scientific studies are made superficially and the decisions of courts are not adequately supported by legal theory. From a viewpoint of the deterrence of infringement the punishment of intellectual property crime is not to be ignored. Because of the much influence of criminal sanctions on the defendant the proper range of punishment is also to be sought.
On the basis of the awareness of these problems this article deals with four main themes related to the intellectual property crime. Chapter Ⅱ contains comparative studies on intellectual property crimes of some countries e.g. Germany, U.S., Japan and TRIPs. Chapter Ⅲ covers the statistics of criminal sanctions and its analyses. In Chapter Ⅳ intellectual property crimes in the present laws are typically described. Chapter Ⅴ deals with the features and problems of intellectual property crimes in the present laws.
In this paper some points, which are considered important in relation to intellectual property crime are discussed only in general. The more researches to make clear the concrete problems is to maintain.
Nowadays the problems of intellectual property infringement are much discussed. This study is however focussed on the area of civil law e.g. civil remedies, injunctive relief. The criminal study on intellectual property infringement is relatively insufficient. The scientific studies are made superficially and the decisions of courts are not adequately supported by legal theory. From a viewpoint of the deterrence of infringement the punishment of intellectual property crime is not to be ignored. Because of the much influence of criminal sanctions on the defendant the proper range of punishment is also to be sought.
On the basis of the awareness of these problems this article deals with four main themes related to the intellectual property crime. Chapter Ⅱ contains comparative studies on intellectual property crimes of some countries e.g. Germany, U.S., Japan and TRIPs. Chapter Ⅲ covers the statistics of criminal sanctions and its analyses. In Chapter Ⅳ intellectual property crimes in the present laws are typically described. Chapter Ⅴ deals with the features and problems of intellectual property crimes in the present laws.
In this paper some points, which are considered important in relation to intellectual property crime are discussed only in general. The more researches to make clear the concrete problems is to maintain.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 지적재산범죄에 관한 비교법적 고찰
Ⅲ. 지적재산법죄의 현황
Ⅳ. 현행법상 지적재산범죄 유형
Ⅴ. 현행법상 지적재산범죄의 특징과 문제점
Ⅴ. 결론
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지적재산권 보호를 위한 제도개선과제의 검토 및 그에 따른 법 개정 방향
법학연구
2004 .12
-
지적재산권 보호의 법적 근거에 관한 해석론으로서 철학적 논거
홍익법학
2012 .01
-
지식재산권의 헌법적 의미와 국가의 책무
원광법학
2014 .01
-
지적재산권 침해에 대한 형사적 제재
형사정책연구원 연구총서
1993 .12
-
지식재산권의 해석 도구로서 재산권(Property)과 자연독점(Natural Monopoly) - 미국에서의 법경제학적 논의를 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2013 .01
-
중국의 지적재산권 보호제도
기업법연구
2007 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018450951