지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The original motivation to write this paper was some simple curiosities on the frequent occurrences of mystical grammatical forms such as sye(셰) and mat?y(마듸), which functioned like bound nouns or so-called the postmodifiers in the regional materials of late 19th century South-western dialects. In now-a-days dialect survey field works on this South-western regions, we can't find out any native speakers, who make use of those grammatical forms or at least some reflexes in natural every-day vernaculars. In the time of late 19th century of South-western dialects, one of above mentioned bound nouns sye(셰) appeared typically after fixed modifier with meaning of "has no choice but to do" or "can not help doing". So, what happened in the statues of those grammatical forms during the advent of Modem Korean at the turns of 20th century?
In the course of investigating those grammatical forms, inadvertently I have come across the much controversial realms of bound noun system in Recent Korean as well as that of Modem Korean. But, at any costs, I have really no intention to participate belatedly in the group of researchers who have had much arguments and armed with strong theories in order to defend their own constructed system of bound nouns in Recent or Modem Korean.
In the first part of my paper, I simply suggested that the assumed mystical grammatical form of sye(셰) have occurred as early as at 16th century Korean in the colloquial style of every day life, especially in the hangeul letter writings. With the help of newly developed grammaticalization theoy(Hopper & Traugott 2003), I argued that the loan word from Chinese '勢'(force), which functioned free noun at first happened to occur repeatedly in the fixed conventionalized syntactic construction such as "-(으)ㄹ+셰+있-/없-". In the course of time with semantic change via metaphorization the free noun '勢'(force) in this exclusive syntactic structure was transformed gradually into grammatical form, which has grammaticalized into bound noun. I maintained convincingly with much contemporary linguistic materials that the other case of grammatical form mat?y(마듸), which appeared as early as in Middle Korean already with much abstracted meaning in the exclusive syntactic environments underwent the same path of grammaticalization.
In the second part of my paper, I have surveyed the dynamic relationship of the grammatical functions between another newly emergent grammatical form such as '슈' (手/數) with old traditional sye(셰) in terms of over-all frame of bound noun system. With much contemporary dialect materials I suggested a strong tendency in the direction of change 셰→슈.
In the course of investigating those grammatical forms, inadvertently I have come across the much controversial realms of bound noun system in Recent Korean as well as that of Modem Korean. But, at any costs, I have really no intention to participate belatedly in the group of researchers who have had much arguments and armed with strong theories in order to defend their own constructed system of bound nouns in Recent or Modem Korean.
In the first part of my paper, I simply suggested that the assumed mystical grammatical form of sye(셰) have occurred as early as at 16th century Korean in the colloquial style of every day life, especially in the hangeul letter writings. With the help of newly developed grammaticalization theoy(Hopper & Traugott 2003), I argued that the loan word from Chinese '勢'(force), which functioned free noun at first happened to occur repeatedly in the fixed conventionalized syntactic construction such as "-(으)ㄹ+셰+있-/없-". In the course of time with semantic change via metaphorization the free noun '勢'(force) in this exclusive syntactic structure was transformed gradually into grammatical form, which has grammaticalized into bound noun. I maintained convincingly with much contemporary linguistic materials that the other case of grammatical form mat?y(마듸), which appeared as early as in Middle Korean already with much abstracted meaning in the exclusive syntactic environments underwent the same path of grammaticalization.
In the second part of my paper, I have surveyed the dynamic relationship of the grammatical functions between another newly emergent grammatical form such as '슈' (手/數) with old traditional sye(셰) in terms of over-all frame of bound noun system. With much contemporary dialect materials I suggested a strong tendency in the direction of change 셰→슈.
목차
1. 서론
2. 의존명사의 설정 기준과, 진행 중에 있는 의존명사의 문법화
3. 의존명사 체계에서의 유기적 관계와 역사적 연속성
4. 19세기 국어 방언에서 일부 의존명사 기능의 축소와 새로운 형성
5. 결론 : 요약과 남는 문제들
【참고문헌】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘밖에’의 어휘화, 문법화 연구―문헌자료를 중심으로―
우리말연구
2017 .01
-
The NP parameter and grammatical nouns in Korean
언어
1999 .09
-
근대국어학 시기의 의존명사 범주 형성 과정 연구
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
Bound Noun man in Korean
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
현대국어 (역)문법화 논의를 위한 몇 문제
국어문학
2016 .03
-
명사와 국어사
한국어학
2014 .02
-
한국어 교육에서 의존명사에 의한 문법적 연어 연구
언어과학
2010 .01
-
The Need For Grammatical Relations And Syntactic Levels
언어
1985 .12
-
의존명사의 의미와 문법화
겨레어문학
2014 .01
-
19세기 초기부터 20세기 초기까지의 한국어는 어떤 모습이었나 : 주로 문법사적 기술을 중심으로
우리말글
2007 .12
-
The Relationship between Semantic Bleaching and Syntax: A Case from Bound Noun cwung in Korean
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Bound Noun cis in Korean
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
한국어의 문법화와 역문법화 현상
담화와인지
2001 .12
-
러시아어 문법적 성에 대한 연구 : 명사 문법적 성의 상징의미를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2011 .08
-
Bound Noun swu in Korean, a Nominative Complex Noun Phrase or a Grammaticalized Noun: A Reply to Tchoe (2015)
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
한국어 근거 표현 ‘-ㄴ 만큼’의 의미 변화와 문법화
담화와인지
2019 .08
-
문법화의 이론과 국어의 문법화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2003 .09
-
15세기 의존명사 목록의 재검토
동악어문학
2018 .10
-
‘인가’의 문법 범주에 대하여
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
A grammatical approach to the "as if" construction
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2018 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-018500316