메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국교회사연구소 교회사연구 敎會史硏究 第32輯
발행연도
2009.6
수록면
209 - 274 (66page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We could call it the conceptual history, or l'histoire des concepts in french, Die Begriffsgeschichte in germany: the intellectual enterprise that analyses some coined words which emerged suddenly in a certain historical point, or in some cases the antiquated concepts attached with an absolutely new and different meaning in the historical and cultural context. Nowadays in the humanities and the social sciences it is regarded with the considerable trial which would animate the academic discussion. This judgement seems to be the effects from the problematique that for establishing their disciplinary identities and being able to suggest the agenda for the new horizon of their studies it is indispensable to re-examinate reflectively the taken-for-granted terminologies in their own usage.
These tendencies are observed as wide spread phenomena in some area; exempli gratia, literature, philosophy, history of religions, political sciences etc. In fact the church history can not be exempted from this urgent demand. Although the christianity insist the universal truth and the Evangel for the salvation of the whole mankind, it cannot be neglected the point that in western history the christianity has developed its own communicable language on the basis of the particular cultural configuration. Therefore we would like to call the church history in the eastern missionary area as a process of semantic conflicts and creative transformations between two local languages, western and eastern.
Nevertheless, in the academic circle of the korean church history the above proposition has been untouched until the very recent years. Probably the reason is due to the stuffy positivism and amateurism which widely dominate and delimitate the milieu of relevant studies. This humble paper tried to realize the conceptual investigation of some catholic vocabularies that are used for self-evident both in the common usage and scholarly discours. In doing so, as the object for analysis we chose the terms such as the various chinese names of christian God, the Superstitio and Haeresis, the Civilis and Politicus from the historic controversy about chinese rites(1643~1742).
And these concepts were constructed in the documents of quite famous authors who played an important role in the debate. For example, the Seventeen Questionnaires of Fr. Juan Bautista de Morales(1643), Dominican missionary, the Four Questionnaires of Fr. Martino Martini(1651), S.J., the Decree of Mgr. Charles Maigrot(1693), MEP, the Bulls, Ex Illa Die of Clemens XI(1715) and Ex Quo Singulari of Benedict XIV(1742) etc. We would understand the signification of those debatable concepts from the framework of unintended interweave of Heterodoxia(half-inclusive attitude to the Other) and Heteroglossia Bakhtinian(coexistence of different voices and possibility of the hybrid utterance). Our interpretation about the conceptual implication of chinese rites controversy wishes to give another possibility of reflective thinking to the academic interest in the historical experience of East-Asian Catholic Church.

목차

1. 문제 설정: 낱말에 대한 되새김질
2. 왜 또다시 의례 논쟁인가?
3. 미신(Superstitio)과 이단(異端)의 변주곡
4. 자기라는 거울에 투사된 것들, 예절 혹은 정치
5. 번역(traductio)인가, 반역(traditio)인가
6. 글을 맺으며: 장미라는 이름이 남긴 것
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-236-018545563