메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 현대미술사연구 제24집
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
167 - 202 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Inspired by the exhibition entitled “Barney and Beuys: All in the Present Must be Transformed”, which was organized at the Guggenheim Museums in Berlin and Venice in 2007 by Nancy Spector, I determined to examine not only the underlying philosophical questions on the use of myth but also the fundamental differences of the two distinguished contemporary artists, Matthew Barney and Joseph Beuys. The first point is closely related to the intrinsic involvement of myth and the use of newly concerned materials such as fat and petroleum jelly (Vaseline) that the two artists retrospectively employed. Their works and writings seem to testify to the fact that Barney and Beuys are constructing and deconstructing mythology that is already dead in our time.
The highly esoteric and freemasonic narratives that Barney unfolds in the five series of his Cremaster Cycleembody his own longing for the death of mythology. Yet his construction of Cremasterparadoxically engenders a fresh way of looking at the individual, society and the world as a different entity, which we ordinarily think of as enduringly consistent, ordered and interwoven, or as M. Foucault would say, “discursive.” To a certain degree, Barney’s gestures and performances extend cryptic symbolism to a socio-cultural realm, because the body and gender he brings to life in his performances negates the Oedipal complex, inviting a new gender of “Body without Organs”, as in the writings of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. This is best exemplified in Barney’s MILE HIGH Threshold: FIGHT with the ANAL SADISTIC WARRIOR and BLIND PERINEUM, in which he uses his own body as a visual field emblem, sealing his orifices with Vaselin. In Fornication with the Fabric of Space, the artist exposes the interlocked relationship between sports, muscle, resistance and sexual desire in the use of non-phallic images. While Beuys’s social activism is characterized best in his perception and practice of “Social Sculpture”, Barney’s Cremaster Cycle interjects personally invented mythology in the realm of psychological situation and condition in his work.
My paper also looks at the way in which both artists, representing different generations and nationalities, directly respond to the social, political and cultural strata in which their works are created, and in which political and ecological agendas are highly charged. Dialectically, these idiosyncratic performers can be placed vis-a-vis each other. The intersecting element of these two artists is that, in spite of their differences in concepts and ideas, they engage in a constant and metaphoric search of the philosopher’s stone by which ancient scholars happened to discover alchemy and science. Equally, the same initiation of shamanistic ceremonies and performative diverts these two artists as far as they can go. The media they embrace is quite different: Beuys uses theatrical means for his performance art whereas Barney has been reinventing new possibilities in the cinematic genre for his collaborations with professional actors, as well as people on the street. Walter Benjamin’s Aura is to be challenged and reinterpretedin the new guise of an authentic, esoteric, lingering remembrance of theatricality in Barney’s oeuvre.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 바니와 보이스 : 왜 신화에 주목하는가?
Ⅲ. 바니의 〈구속의 드로잉〉 연작 : 새로운 시각적 장력으로서의 몸과 구속
Ⅳ. 보이스의 연극과 바니의 시네마 : 사회비판을 향해
Ⅴ. 재료 선택과 연금술
Ⅵ. 결론: 바니의 작품 〈크리매스터 사이클〉의 성공과 실패
참고문헌
Abstract
「매튜 바니와 요셉 보이스」에 대한 질의

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-560-018619007