지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A series of writers' studies try to examine relations between Korean and Japanese by using the statistics method. The 200 basic vocabulary that Swadesh selected was used with these studies and fitted it for this and made Korean and Japanese basic vocabulary. In the last study, I made use of a table of 16 dialectic basic vocabulary by a city of Korea, and factor analysis was used for the statistics method.
In order to make Korean and Japanese relation clear further with research this time for a relation of a language of tree type figure, Korean city 16 dialectic basic vocabularies data, I make use of a cluster analysis that I display I made a wide-area dialect 10 pieces of basic vocabulary.
Because I analyzed it, 21 language form three groups of Korean (16 dialect and meddle Korean) and Japanese(old Japanese, Shuri dialect, and Tokyo dialect) and Ainu. If these three groups suppose it the thing which split from one common ancestor language, which split in the almost same time, or Ainu is divided into it a little early, and it can think that Korean and Japanese common ancestor language was divided into Korean and Japanese just after that.
About Japanese, Shuri dialect first split and were next and split for old Japanese and Tokyo dialect. About Korean, Meddle Korean first splits and can understand that Cheju Island dialect split after that. About a dialect of modern Korean, a dialect of North Korea first splits and thinks that it split for a various dialect after that.
The result of this Study became the result that the result of the factor analysis of the last research was complemented and which was useful to explain.
Ainu split with a common proto language in process of a statistical analysis it is a time, a difference occurred for time that medieval Korean and Cheju Island dialect split with Korean, result of analyzing it about a split of a present Korean dialect then. It is thought to be a selection problem at a quantitative insufficiency of data and a basic vocabulary as the cause. Exact and immense data are necessary further.
In order to make Korean and Japanese relation clear further with research this time for a relation of a language of tree type figure, Korean city 16 dialectic basic vocabularies data, I make use of a cluster analysis that I display I made a wide-area dialect 10 pieces of basic vocabulary.
Because I analyzed it, 21 language form three groups of Korean (16 dialect and meddle Korean) and Japanese(old Japanese, Shuri dialect, and Tokyo dialect) and Ainu. If these three groups suppose it the thing which split from one common ancestor language, which split in the almost same time, or Ainu is divided into it a little early, and it can think that Korean and Japanese common ancestor language was divided into Korean and Japanese just after that.
About Japanese, Shuri dialect first split and were next and split for old Japanese and Tokyo dialect. About Korean, Meddle Korean first splits and can understand that Cheju Island dialect split after that. About a dialect of modern Korean, a dialect of North Korea first splits and thinks that it split for a various dialect after that.
The result of this Study became the result that the result of the factor analysis of the last research was complemented and which was useful to explain.
Ainu split with a common proto language in process of a statistical analysis it is a time, a difference occurred for time that medieval Korean and Cheju Island dialect split with Korean, result of analyzing it about a split of a present Korean dialect then. It is thought to be a selection problem at a quantitative insufficiency of data and a basic vocabulary as the cause. Exact and immense data are necessary further.
목차
〈要旨〉
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 先行硏究
Ⅲ. 韓ㆍ日 兩國語 方言의 基礎語彙
Ⅳ. 語頭子音의 클러스터分析
Ⅴ. 結論
【?考文?】
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서남방언의 하위방언구획과 네트워크 분석
언어학
2017 .04
-
방언 어휘 대조 연구 방법 시고(試考)
한말연구
2019 .01
-
계량적 연구를 통해 본 중국 방언의 분리와 통합
중어중문학
2004 .06
-
서울 거주 방언 화자의 코드 선택 양상 - 20∼30대 경상도 출신 방언 화자를 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
Perceptual Dialectology and Language Attitudes : A View from Gyeongsang Dialect Speakers
언어과학연구
2015 .12
-
북한의 방전구획에 대한 고찰
한국학연구
2001 .11
-
국어사전과 방언의 정보화
국어문학
2016 .03
-
지역어의 역할과 현실대응
어문론총
2019 .01
-
An Acoustic Study of the Cheju Dialect in Korean
언어
1980 .06
-
영어 사회방언의 한국어 번역 방법 연구
영어영문학연구
2014 .01
-
새로 발굴한 경북의성지역어의 어휘
국어교육연구
2016 .02
-
한국인의 방언 태도에 대한 추이 연구
어문학
2014 .12
-
인터넷 통신 언어 자료에 나타난 대구 지역 고등학생들의 방언 사용 실태
우리말글
2006 .12
-
인터넷 통신 언어에서 보이는 방언 사용의 성별 차이
어문학
2007 .09
-
결혼이민자를 위한 방언 한국어 교재의 필요성 고찰
우리말글
2010 .04
-
漢語蘇州方言和合肥方言入聲字的比較研究
중국학
2019 .01
-
은진 송씨 가문 한글 편지에 나타난 방언형에 대하여
어문연구
2018 .01
-
부산지역 대학생들의 어휘 표준어화와 언어 태도
어문학
2019 .06
-
시교육에서 방언 사용의 함의
국어국문학
2004 .12
-
음소 배열 관계를 이용한 몽골어의 계량 언어학적 비교 연구
알타이학보
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
UNACCUSATIVITY IN KOREAN : A CORPUS LINGUISTIC APPROACH
JUNGAE LEE ALLMAN
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2014
.12
비대격자동사사역구문과 능격자동사사역구문 비교 분석 : 한국어, 일본어와 영어를 중심으로
千昊載
일본어학연구
2004
.09
The Case for Split Unaccusativity Hypothesis
Sangsuk Oh
어학연구
2005
.03
Acquisition of Unaccusativity in L2 Korean by Japanese and Chinese Speakers
Eunjeong Oh
응용언어학
2010
.12
비대격 구문에서의 vP구조의 재구성
김신호
새한영어영문학
2005
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-913-018677700