지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea public arts does not free themselves from the concept "decoration for buildings". This concept of public art has restricted the development of Korean public arts for 22 years. I would like to figure out the cause and suggest several solutions to revise the percent for art ordinance that gives the legal basis for public arts.
The content consist of five chapters: (1) development of the concept of public arts and the percent for art scheme in the foreign countries, (2) history and the present status of the percent for art scheme in Korea, (3) comparison with the foreign and Korean percent for art scheme, (4) suggestions to revise percent for art scheme.
The concept of public art has developed through 4 steps: (1) art in architecture, (2) art in public places, (3) art in urban design, (4) new genre public arts. The conceptual changes reflect the paradigm shift of the cultural development from 'democratization of culture' to 'cultural democracy'. Such conceptual changes had caused the institutional alteration of the percent for art schemes.
The percent for art scheme in Korea was introduced in 1982. The scheme has been based on the concept "decoration for buildings" until now. This conceptual limitation has been the major obstacles to broaden the potential power of public arts in Korea. The annual expenses through the percent for art scheme reaches 50 billion won per year. However this scheme never help to increase the incomes of artists and the amenity of urban civic life.
In comparison with the percent for art schemes in foreign countries, Korean scheme has two peculiarities: (1) the concept of public art is restricted to the decoration for buildings, (2) the scheme has been applied obligatorily to the buildings in the private sector rather than ones in the public sector. Such institutional differences had given Korean public arts many problems -lack of harmony between public arts and architectural environments, the illegal rebates, the unjust and unfair examination of the regional committees etc.
In order to ensure the development of public arts in Korea, it is necessary to revise the legal basis for public arts - the percent for art scheme. I would like to suggest several solutions: (1) to alter the legal terms of the scheme from "decoration for buildings" to "public arts", (2) to increase the portion of the public sector and to introduce the pooling system, (3) to make all the information related to the scheme public (4) to create the public arts support programs in the National Foundation of Arts in order to promote the experiments in the public arts-for examples, new genre public arts.
The content consist of five chapters: (1) development of the concept of public arts and the percent for art scheme in the foreign countries, (2) history and the present status of the percent for art scheme in Korea, (3) comparison with the foreign and Korean percent for art scheme, (4) suggestions to revise percent for art scheme.
The concept of public art has developed through 4 steps: (1) art in architecture, (2) art in public places, (3) art in urban design, (4) new genre public arts. The conceptual changes reflect the paradigm shift of the cultural development from 'democratization of culture' to 'cultural democracy'. Such conceptual changes had caused the institutional alteration of the percent for art schemes.
The percent for art scheme in Korea was introduced in 1982. The scheme has been based on the concept "decoration for buildings" until now. This conceptual limitation has been the major obstacles to broaden the potential power of public arts in Korea. The annual expenses through the percent for art scheme reaches 50 billion won per year. However this scheme never help to increase the incomes of artists and the amenity of urban civic life.
In comparison with the percent for art schemes in foreign countries, Korean scheme has two peculiarities: (1) the concept of public art is restricted to the decoration for buildings, (2) the scheme has been applied obligatorily to the buildings in the private sector rather than ones in the public sector. Such institutional differences had given Korean public arts many problems -lack of harmony between public arts and architectural environments, the illegal rebates, the unjust and unfair examination of the regional committees etc.
In order to ensure the development of public arts in Korea, it is necessary to revise the legal basis for public arts - the percent for art scheme. I would like to suggest several solutions: (1) to alter the legal terms of the scheme from "decoration for buildings" to "public arts", (2) to increase the portion of the public sector and to introduce the pooling system, (3) to make all the information related to the scheme public (4) to create the public arts support programs in the National Foundation of Arts in order to promote the experiments in the public arts-for examples, new genre public arts.
목차
1. 서론
2. 공공미술 개념의 확대와 제도적 변화
3. 우리나라 건축물 미술장식제도의 역사와 현황
4. 서구와 우리나라의 공공미술 개념과 제도 비교
5. 건축물에 대한 ‘미술장식’ 제도를 ‘공공미술’ 제도로 전환하기 위한 과제
참고문헌
Abstract
공공미술의 제도적 기반에 대한 미술시장 측면에서의 질의문
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공공미술에서의 환경조형물에 관한 연구 : Public Arts에서 Environment Art에 관한 연구
Archives of Design Research
2002 .11
-
공공미술과 법제 : 2011년 개정 문화예술진흥법 조사
현대미술학 논문집
2012 .06
-
미술과 공공성 : 공공미술에 대한 미학적 고찰
현대미술학 논문집
2008 .12
-
1950년대의 한국미술(1), 제1공화국 미술의 태동과 진통
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
무용과 과학기술을 융합한 그룹 E.A.T.에 관한 연구
무용예술학연구
2019 .01
-
지역 미술과 권력
미술이론과 현장
2005 .01
-
지하철역의 공공미술과 장소 정체성에 관한 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2020 .01
-
‘움직이는 조각’과 공연예술
서양미술사학회논문집
1990 .12
-
예술과 경제
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
-
현대미술과 시장 : 예술의 자율성과 자본의 힘 사이에서
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
-
학교미술교육 강화를 위한 미술 교과서 내용 개선 제안: 동시대 미술, 지역사회 연계 미술(공공미술), 미술 감상·미술관교육의 3가지 핵심 주제를 중심으로
조형교육
2020 .01
-
모두를 위한 엘리트주의 : 공동체적 가치의 담론 장場으로서 미술비평
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
-
현대미술 감상 및 표현수업 지도방안 연구 - 실험적 관점에 의한 7가지 방법론을 중심으로 -
조형교육
2009 .01
-
Case Study of Community Art Project as Public Art : Focused on Community Approach
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2010 .10
-
사회적 가치 실현을 위한 공공미술의 협력적 거버넌스에 관한 연구
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2020 .01
-
기야 이방운의 《정미년(丁未年) 사계산수도첩(四季山水圖帖)》 연구
미술사와 문화유산
2016 .02
-
미술과 공예 : 그 경계와 위상
미술사학
2007 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-560-018685287