인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The key to critical recognition about the private land theory in the debates around the land ownership theory at present depends on the aspect of the spread of notions of private land and the inaccurate understanding of dual reality of 'private land' included in system of national land distribution. The significance Baek Nam-Wun's land ownership theory has is that it reconsidered the conceptual limit of 'ownership' confined to private land theory, and suggested the possibility of class ownership gwajeon(Rank Land) of jeonsigwa had.
Baek Nam-Wun explained the former as state ownership theory and tax=rent theory, which included the merit of trying to investigate the characteristic of premodern asiatic feudal state and the significance of pointing out the limit of private land ownership. In terms of the latter, he pointed out that in relation to gwajeon of jeonsigwa the class ownership was established among the persons given gwaieon and hence concreted the ownership meaning of private land.
The characteristic of asiatic feudal state included in his theory of state ownership of land is considered as a logic of enabling the succession in the future to land ownership theory, in that his suggestion was a original critical mind against the theory of private land. His logic is said to have enough meaning for succession in that it is not a recurrence to the theory of state ownership of land and the duality of ownership included within national system of allocation of land can need to be discussed again. The core of the problem can be also said to reinterpret the meaning of ownership for private land and to understand nature of premodern state.
Baek Nam-Wun explained the former as state ownership theory and tax=rent theory, which included the merit of trying to investigate the characteristic of premodern asiatic feudal state and the significance of pointing out the limit of private land ownership. In terms of the latter, he pointed out that in relation to gwajeon of jeonsigwa the class ownership was established among the persons given gwaieon and hence concreted the ownership meaning of private land.
The characteristic of asiatic feudal state included in his theory of state ownership of land is considered as a logic of enabling the succession in the future to land ownership theory, in that his suggestion was a original critical mind against the theory of private land. His logic is said to have enough meaning for succession in that it is not a recurrence to the theory of state ownership of land and the duality of ownership included within national system of allocation of land can need to be discussed again. The core of the problem can be also said to reinterpret the meaning of ownership for private land and to understand nature of premodern state.
#백남운
#아시아적 봉건제
#조세
#지대
#공전
#사전
#민전
#Baek Nam-Wun
#Asiatic feudalism
#tax
#rent
#public land(kongjeon), private land(sajeon)
#people's land(minjeon)
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 머리말
- Ⅱ. ‘아시아적 봉건제론’의 의의와 한계
- Ⅲ. ‘조세=지대’론의 허와 실
- Ⅳ. ‘토지국유론’ 그 계승과 전망
- Ⅴ. 맺음말
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002013528
