지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to analyse the meaning of Heart and Mind(마음, 心) which is appeared in both Manhae and Liang Ch'ich'ao(梁啓超)'s thoughts and then consider the characteristics of East-Asia ideology in the early formation period of modern ages based on the results of analysation mentioned above.
Manhae and Liang Ch'ich'ao is contemporaneous with each other. And they are representatives of modern thoughts and literature in Asia. Especially, Manhae accepts Liang Ch'ich'aos's thoughts. This fact makes it possible that we can consider the corelation between both. But you must not understand that it would be one-sided or upper and lower sided relations. Because Manhae accepts it and also trans-uses it creatively from the point of view of postcolonialism. This paper makes this standpoint clear by analysing Heart and Mind appeard in thoughts of two.
Liang Ch'ich'ao appropriates the tradition of practical ethics in teachings of Wang Yang-ming. He emphasizes the mental power and through it he establishes the scheme of ethics correctly in China. When it comes to saying this, the concept of self-awakeness(自得) is what he emphasizes. Manhae also stipulate the meaning of heart and mind in the tradition of Buddism. Heart and Mind is individual and universal at the same time. That is. Heart and Mind means the realisation of universal Buddahood. Through this, he forms the scheme of modern ethics in Chosun. Here, emerging concept is self-awakeness(自心) in Buddahood (similar to that of Liang Ch'ich'ao).
There are some difference and commons between Liang Ch'ich'ao and Manhae. Looking commons; First, Heart and Mind has the meaning of individuality and univerality too. Second, their thoughts begin with conventional Confucianism and Buddism but end with modernized appropriation. Third, Heart and Mind is recognized as centricity of modern scheme of ethics.
Differences are; the meaning of Heart and Mind in thought of Liang Ch'ich'ao comes down to the concept of nationalismic nation whereas that of Manhae moves foward to Buddism oriented cosmopolitanism beyond nationalism.
Heart and Mind in East-Asian modern ideology has peculiar meaning. It is in with a process of coupling and using together of West and the rest of it or tradition and modernity by East-Asian men of thoughts.
Manhae and Liang Ch'ich'ao is contemporaneous with each other. And they are representatives of modern thoughts and literature in Asia. Especially, Manhae accepts Liang Ch'ich'aos's thoughts. This fact makes it possible that we can consider the corelation between both. But you must not understand that it would be one-sided or upper and lower sided relations. Because Manhae accepts it and also trans-uses it creatively from the point of view of postcolonialism. This paper makes this standpoint clear by analysing Heart and Mind appeard in thoughts of two.
Liang Ch'ich'ao appropriates the tradition of practical ethics in teachings of Wang Yang-ming. He emphasizes the mental power and through it he establishes the scheme of ethics correctly in China. When it comes to saying this, the concept of self-awakeness(自得) is what he emphasizes. Manhae also stipulate the meaning of heart and mind in the tradition of Buddism. Heart and Mind is individual and universal at the same time. That is. Heart and Mind means the realisation of universal Buddahood. Through this, he forms the scheme of modern ethics in Chosun. Here, emerging concept is self-awakeness(自心) in Buddahood (similar to that of Liang Ch'ich'ao).
There are some difference and commons between Liang Ch'ich'ao and Manhae. Looking commons; First, Heart and Mind has the meaning of individuality and univerality too. Second, their thoughts begin with conventional Confucianism and Buddism but end with modernized appropriation. Third, Heart and Mind is recognized as centricity of modern scheme of ethics.
Differences are; the meaning of Heart and Mind in thought of Liang Ch'ich'ao comes down to the concept of nationalismic nation whereas that of Manhae moves foward to Buddism oriented cosmopolitanism beyond nationalism.
Heart and Mind in East-Asian modern ideology has peculiar meaning. It is in with a process of coupling and using together of West and the rest of it or tradition and modernity by East-Asian men of thoughts.
목차
1. 동아시아 근대의 외부와 내부
2. 양계초의 『신민설』을 통해 본 ‘마음(心)’의 의미
3. 만해의 문학사상을 통해 본 ‘마음’의 의미
4. 동아시아적 시각에서 본 마음의 의미
참고문헌
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아 근대담론 속에 나타난 민족과 윤리주체의 의미 고찰 : 萬海사상과 梁啓超의『新民設』을 중심으로
동악어문학
2009 .08
-
梁啓超思想의 構造的理解 : 近年의 諸硏究를 中心으로
역사학보
1965 .09
-
Manhae’s Understanding of Buddhism
Korea Journal
2000 .06
-
梁啓超의 前期史論과 그 혁신성 - 「新史學」史論을 중심으로 -
역사와 담론
2004 .12
-
A Study of Manhae Han Yong-un
Korea Journal
1999 .12
-
萬海와 少太山의 佛敎改革論에 關한 比較硏究
코기토
1993 .06
-
萬海詩와 當代詩의 영향관계에 관한 일고찰 : 시어 ‘님’을 중심으로
한국시학연구
2007 .12
-
만해 한용운 시에 나타난 ‘바다’ 의식 연구 : 레비나스의 타자철학을 중심으로
문학과환경
2013 .06
-
공자의 ‘마음' 논의: 흰 마음과 검은 마음
동양철학연구
2012 .01
-
孟子의 마음(心)과 氣
동양철학연구
2005 .01
-
楊簡의 心學에 있어서 ‘心卽道’의 원칙과 그 修養經
동양철학
2006 .01
-
My Heart
Korea Journal
1979 .05
-
Heart
Korea Journal
1976 .01
-
만해 한용운과 니체 : 니체와 불교 사이에 선 만해
동서인문
2017 .10
-
The Mind of Man
Korea Journal
1977 .09
-
Empty Mind
Korea Journal
1979 .11
-
과연 뜰까? 만해(萬海)의 〈나룻배와 행인〉에 대한 단상
국어국문학
2005 .05
-
웅십력의 성지 수양법 — ‘格物致知’ 논변을 중심으로 —
동양철학연구
2012 .01
-
만해 한용운의 불교관 이해와 현대적 계승의 관점
불교연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-018992326