인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This article has studied on what kind of values one will possess upon reading the piece Hojil(호질) through the history of idea flow in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Joseon in this periodwent through efforts for ideological changes and in particular, the rise of Wang Yangming philosophy needs close attention. The reason for this is that as Confucianism, which supported Joseon, started to fall, it is the period when Wang Yangming philosophy started becoming recognized as an official philosophy to substitute Confucianism. As this history of idea flow acts as element of foundation of the piece, it has a special meaning.
In the pieceare two characters who establish a tense relationship. In the piece, the tiger and Bugoaseonsaeng(북곽선생)rule the world with clear distinctions and try to meet each other but fails. The process of the two characters trying to meet and the result holds important narrative form of the piece. Such trait can be seen when the tiger reproves humans. Such characteristic can be seen as the tiger is shown criticizing Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), using words that were used in ideological issues.
The tiger criticizes the human world based on Wang Yangming ideology. Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), who hears that criticism, has ideas based on Confucianism. Such Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), based on Confucianism, has nothing to say against the tiger’s Wang Yangming philosophical criticism. The two worlds meeting and trying to make up but failing has much to do with the history of idea flows. The reason that two worlds, Confucianism and Wang Yangming philosophy, in this piece seems to be the result of ideological situation that took place in Joseon in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus, the introduction and development of Wang Yangming philosophy acts as an important ideological foundation making up the piece.
In the pieceare two characters who establish a tense relationship. In the piece, the tiger and Bugoaseonsaeng(북곽선생)rule the world with clear distinctions and try to meet each other but fails. The process of the two characters trying to meet and the result holds important narrative form of the piece. Such trait can be seen when the tiger reproves humans. Such characteristic can be seen as the tiger is shown criticizing Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), using words that were used in ideological issues.
The tiger criticizes the human world based on Wang Yangming ideology. Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), who hears that criticism, has ideas based on Confucianism. Such Bugoaseonsaeng (북곽선생), based on Confucianism, has nothing to say against the tiger’s Wang Yangming philosophical criticism. The two worlds meeting and trying to make up but failing has much to do with the history of idea flows. The reason that two worlds, Confucianism and Wang Yangming philosophy, in this piece seems to be the result of ideological situation that took place in Joseon in the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century-18<SUP>th</SUP> century. Thus, the introduction and development of Wang Yangming philosophy acts as an important ideological foundation making up the piece.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001648429
