지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 2 (126page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Victim-Offender-Mediation(VOM) is one of the practices of Restorative Justice which used to describe alternative ways of responding to crime. Mediation between the parties to a criminal act provides victims and offenders with a forum to mete out justice. In VOM, both sides have an opportunity to explain their behavior to each other. Victims can describe how they suffered, vent their anger, and condemn the conduct of the offender who harmed them. Offenders can explain what they did and why from their own perspective. Victims hear what happened directly their offender in his or her own words. Thus, victim can come to understand, without condoning, what the offender did. VOM with this form is accepted worldwide as a program which can resolve criminal complaints without a trial by having the victim and the offender enter into a negotiated agreement.
Criminal Mediation represents just one of a myriad of such a mediations that have spread throughout the criminal justice system for more than twenty-five years. In some jurisdiction, VOM explicitly became part of the special penal law regarding juvenile and adolescent defendants. VOM is evaluated nowadays as more efficient than the criminal justice system itself, and as more satisfactory for those directly involved.
However, many barriers still exist for jurisdictions wishing to adopt a criminal mediation program. Especially criminal mediation evokes both practical and controversial constitutional concerns about its place in the criminal justice system. Therefore this paper addresses and responds to principle of criminal liability and constitutional concerns regarding mediation's role within the criminal justice system. and criminal and they must be carefully considered before instituting such a program.
In this paper I emphasized on the one hand, that VOM fits to the classic task of criminal law, which is to prevent further offenses by influencing the offender and the public. It states on the other hand, that VOM is a reaction to criminal offence which restores peace between victim, offender and society, and can make additional criminal sanctions superfluous. A legal framework for VOM follows: Court judge and public prosecutors are entitled to divert officially 'suitable case' to a VOM-project, and eventually to dismiss fully the formal criminal procedure(special category of the legal offence) or a sanction can be mitigated(the other category of the legal offence) after a successful mediation has taken place. Although the key attribute of VOM is 'autonomy principle', but it should be also controlled criminal justice system, lest the offedners' liberty and victims' safety should be threated.
Criminal Mediation represents just one of a myriad of such a mediations that have spread throughout the criminal justice system for more than twenty-five years. In some jurisdiction, VOM explicitly became part of the special penal law regarding juvenile and adolescent defendants. VOM is evaluated nowadays as more efficient than the criminal justice system itself, and as more satisfactory for those directly involved.
However, many barriers still exist for jurisdictions wishing to adopt a criminal mediation program. Especially criminal mediation evokes both practical and controversial constitutional concerns about its place in the criminal justice system. Therefore this paper addresses and responds to principle of criminal liability and constitutional concerns regarding mediation's role within the criminal justice system. and criminal and they must be carefully considered before instituting such a program.
In this paper I emphasized on the one hand, that VOM fits to the classic task of criminal law, which is to prevent further offenses by influencing the offender and the public. It states on the other hand, that VOM is a reaction to criminal offence which restores peace between victim, offender and society, and can make additional criminal sanctions superfluous. A legal framework for VOM follows: Court judge and public prosecutors are entitled to divert officially 'suitable case' to a VOM-project, and eventually to dismiss fully the formal criminal procedure(special category of the legal offence) or a sanction can be mitigated(the other category of the legal offence) after a successful mediation has taken place. Although the key attribute of VOM is 'autonomy principle', but it should be also controlled criminal justice system, lest the offedners' liberty and victims' safety should be threated.
목차
국문요약
제1장 들어가는 말
제2장 형사조정제도의 의의 및 역사
제3장 법제화된 세계 각국의 형사조정제도
제4장 형사조정제도의 도입에 따른 형법 이론적ㆍ헌법적 문제점
제5장 우리나라에서의 형사조정제도와 새로운 형사조정제도의 도입방향
제6장 나오는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
-
현행 범죄피해자보호법상 형사조정제도의 검토
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
[새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축(Ⅰ)] 형사화해조정제도 도입을 위한 기초연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
刑事調停制度의 活性化方案
원광법학
2013 .01
-
새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축방안(Ⅱ) - 형사화해조정체계의 구축을 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안 총괄보고서
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
형사사법절차에의 범죄피해자 참여제도실효화 방안
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
형법에 있어서 피해자측면에 관한 연구
법학연구
2007 .06
-
나이사이(內濟)제도에 대한 小考 - 일본 에도(江戶)시대의 전통적인 대체적 분쟁해결방법 -
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
회복적 사법의 실천으로서 형사조정
한양법학
2015 .11
-
형사조정실무의 문제점과 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
범죄피해자와 형사절차참여에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2008 .01
-
형사사법절차상 형사합의 관행의 실태분석과 제도화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
형사조정프로그램에 대한 조정위원의 평가 - 조정위원 설문조사 결과를 중심으로 -
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
형사상 조정제도의 목적에 따른 분류와 그 절차적 함의 -미국의 논의를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
수사기관의 범죄피해자 정보제공제도 발전방안
피해자학연구
2012 .01
-
범죄피해자와 회복적 사법의 모델
피해자학연구
2005 .01
-
범죄피해자 보호제도에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
回復的 司法의 意義와 그 受容可能性
법학연구
2003 .12
-
刑事節次上 被害者의 參加 -독일과 오스트리아 법제도를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
형사재판절차에서의 범죄피해자참가제도의 도입 방안
피해자학연구
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-364-002067694