지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The policy agenda setting of bioethics in Korea started with the birth of cloned animal Dolly. The public agenda for opposition to human-cloning was shaped under the movement of NGOs. But the formulation of policy agenda began with the governmental part.
There were five attempts to legislate for bioethics from the National Assembly and the Executive Branch from 1977 to 2001. Three members of the National Assembly during three years, the Ministry of Health and Welfare(MOHW) and the Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST) during two years were the major actors for the agenda setting. However, all of the attempts failed in legislation.
This paper focuses on the question: what were the main factors leading the actors to legislation for bioethics in Korea?
To answer these questions systemically, this paper draws on the concept of policy networks developed by Rhodes & Marsh. According to the model of Rhodes & Marsh, there are four dimensions(membership, intergration, resources, power) distinguishing the two types of policy networks: policy community and issue network. This model is a very useful tool for understanding policy making bioethics agenda in Korea.
The typology of policy network started with policy community model. The number of participants were very limited in 1998: National Assembly, MOST, and scientists. They shared two basic values, that is, the improvement of biotechnology is more important than bioehtics, and more scientists have to participate in policy agenda setting process. The NGOs were consciously excluded in policy community.
However the policy network was changed later. In 2001 issue network as well as policy community appeared simultaneously. MOHW, NGO, and mass media newly entered on the stage of policy agenda setting as powerful actors.
There were five attempts to legislate for bioethics from the National Assembly and the Executive Branch from 1977 to 2001. Three members of the National Assembly during three years, the Ministry of Health and Welfare(MOHW) and the Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST) during two years were the major actors for the agenda setting. However, all of the attempts failed in legislation.
This paper focuses on the question: what were the main factors leading the actors to legislation for bioethics in Korea?
To answer these questions systemically, this paper draws on the concept of policy networks developed by Rhodes & Marsh. According to the model of Rhodes & Marsh, there are four dimensions(membership, intergration, resources, power) distinguishing the two types of policy networks: policy community and issue network. This model is a very useful tool for understanding policy making bioethics agenda in Korea.
The typology of policy network started with policy community model. The number of participants were very limited in 1998: National Assembly, MOST, and scientists. They shared two basic values, that is, the improvement of biotechnology is more important than bioehtics, and more scientists have to participate in policy agenda setting process. The NGOs were consciously excluded in policy community.
However the policy network was changed later. In 2001 issue network as well as policy community appeared simultaneously. MOHW, NGO, and mass media newly entered on the stage of policy agenda setting as powerful actors.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 입법부 주도기: 이슈 조성기
Ⅳ. 행정부 주도기: 이슈 확립기
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
생명윤리 입법과정에 관한 정책네트워크 분석, 1997~2003
기술혁신학회지
2005 .08
-
생명윤리 및 안전 관련 입법정책
생명윤리
2003 .06
-
인체유래 생물자원 관련 생명윤리정책 제언
생명윤리
2010 .06
-
선도기술개발사업(G7)의 정책결정 과정 분석: 범부처간 추진 과정 및 민간 전문가 역할을 중심으로
기술혁신연구
2008 .01
-
한국 생명윤리의 과거와 현재
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .04
-
사회투자론적 관점에서 본 새 정부의 가정정책 : 분석과 과제
한국가족자원경영학회지
2008 .01
-
생명윤리교육이 간호보건대학생의 생명윤리의식에 미치는 영향
생명윤리
2013 .06
-
장애 이해의 해석학적 구조화와 법 : 생명윤리안전법상 유전자검사 규율의 방향 모색
생명윤리
2015 .12
-
S&T Policy for SMEs: Lessons Learned and Implications from Korea
Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
2019 .01
-
일-가정 균형과 관련된 법과 정책의 비교고찰
한국가족자원경영학회지
2009 .01
-
성장동력 정책의 개념적 고찰
한국기술혁신학회 학술대회
2019 .11
-
정책 조정의 새로운 접근으로서 정책 통합 : 과학기술혁신정책을 중심으로
기술혁신학회지
2008 .09
-
한국 생명윤리의 과거와 현재 그리고 미래
생명, 윤리와 정책
2017 .04
-
Boundary Agenda between Gender Equality and Human Resource : The Establishment of Policy for Women in Science and Technology in Korea
Asian Women
2009 .06
-
An analysis of the British and American policies on human cloning : What are the lessons for Korea?
생명윤리
2002 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002513479