인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
‘The Terror’ was a key issue in the controversies about the French Revolution around the bicentenary of the Revolution. ‘Revisionist’ historians rejected the orthodox interpretation of the Revolution, according to which the Terror was inevitable in times of national crisis and the Terror could be considered progressive in that the revolutionaries tried to overcome the limits of the bourgeois revolution and to increase democracy through the relative equality in that period. Revisionist historians argued that the counterrevolutionary menace and the invasion of enemies were not the causes but simply pretexts of the Terror. According to their opinions, the discourse of the necessity of the Terror predated the Terror and the ideologies of popular sovereignty and human regeneration dominated this discourse. These ideologies existed in the Revolution of 1789, so the Terror is inseparable from the Revolution of 1789 which is considered a revolution of human rights.
How much have these controversies about the Revolution been reflected in french school-textbooks? The Terror is still defined as exceptional measures and institutions designed to save the country from the critical crisis situation in the school-textbooks. Above all, it is insisted that the Terror was the result of the crisis of the Republic. The textbooks present ‘materials’ to supplement and intensify the ‘lessons’, which include the documents showing the social composition of sans-culottes, their political demands and activities, their relationship with the national assembly, and the discourses of Montagnards. These materials, however, are not of use to explain how the Terror, which seems to be based on popular demands, suppressed in fact the political participation of the people. And the questions added to the materials don't permit to examine the essential point of revisionist interpretation that the discourse of the Terror was associated with the ideology of the Revolution itself. If it can be admitted that not only the formation of national identity, the cultivation of patriotism and civism but also the development of critical spirit, tolerance and recognition of others are the aims of history education, the textbooks will need to offer the reality of the Terror and its conflicting interpretations more frankly and permit the students to examine the different views on the French Revolution.
How much have these controversies about the Revolution been reflected in french school-textbooks? The Terror is still defined as exceptional measures and institutions designed to save the country from the critical crisis situation in the school-textbooks. Above all, it is insisted that the Terror was the result of the crisis of the Republic. The textbooks present ‘materials’ to supplement and intensify the ‘lessons’, which include the documents showing the social composition of sans-culottes, their political demands and activities, their relationship with the national assembly, and the discourses of Montagnards. These materials, however, are not of use to explain how the Terror, which seems to be based on popular demands, suppressed in fact the political participation of the people. And the questions added to the materials don't permit to examine the essential point of revisionist interpretation that the discourse of the Terror was associated with the ideology of the Revolution itself. If it can be admitted that not only the formation of national identity, the cultivation of patriotism and civism but also the development of critical spirit, tolerance and recognition of others are the aims of history education, the textbooks will need to offer the reality of the Terror and its conflicting interpretations more frankly and permit the students to examine the different views on the French Revolution.
#공포정치
#프랑스혁명
#역사교과서
#상황론
#수정해석
#인민주권
#인간재생 이데올로기
#Terror
#French Revolution
#History School-Textbooks
#Theory of ‘Circumstances’
#Revisionist Interpretation
#Popular Sovereignty
#Ideology of Human Regeneration
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 머리말
- 2. 공포정치의 내용과 해석
- 3. 프랑스 역사교과서의 공포정치 서술
- 4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-374-002223969