지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present research studies how human rights movement in the Soviet Union was affected by the signing and implementation of human rights related clauses, finalized in the form of the Final Act and Basket Ⅲ by the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Ironically, the Helsinki Accords had impact upon both the stagnation and revitalization of Soviet human rights movement. In the first place, the Brezhnev regime went heavy hands with the movement, since it wanted to take upper grounds in negotiation with the West. However, Moscow, granted with the post-war borders and its influence upon the Eastern Europe, took it as diplomatic victory. With convoluted confidence, the government went on a wide publicity campaign, including the publication of human-rights clauses on the party newspapers. This provided a fresh inspiration for Soviet human rights activists. This is the background against which a human rights organization called the Moscow Helsinki Group was founded on the excuse that it would monitor the actual implementation by the Brezhnev government. The Moscow Helsinki Group had been active for six years and four months, making it public 230 statements.
The Moscow Helsinki Group exerted its influence upon Soviet republics and beyond, into Eastern European countries. The Group engaged in activities in peaceful and legal ways. Yet the Soviet government cracked down on the movement, making arrests and deportation. It also dismissed all the expression of western concerns, as intervention of internal affairs, citing Clause 6, Basket I. Western countries refrained from taking active responses to these Soviet activists, thinking that it would negative impact upon the detente system.
However, it should be mentioned that the Soviet activists made active use of the Helsinki Accords in widening and strengthening human rights movements at home. In this respective, the Accords is thought to have left positive influence upon the movement. Before the Accords came into being, human rights movement happened in various forms, nationalist, religious and so on. All these different branches of movement were brought into one, the Moscow Helsinki Group, whose shared goal was to demand Moscow to implement the international agreement. Also, the Accords resulted in subdivision of human rights movements into functionally more specific groups.
In conclusion, the Helsinki Accords provided much strengthened moral and legal ground for the Soviet human rights movements. The Accords simply served to verify those values that no society could afford to be exempt from. It overlapped much with what the Soviet activists had persistently claimed for. This is so, in spite of the fact that the Accords was the outcome of political negotiations between the West and East.
The Moscow Helsinki Group exerted its influence upon Soviet republics and beyond, into Eastern European countries. The Group engaged in activities in peaceful and legal ways. Yet the Soviet government cracked down on the movement, making arrests and deportation. It also dismissed all the expression of western concerns, as intervention of internal affairs, citing Clause 6, Basket I. Western countries refrained from taking active responses to these Soviet activists, thinking that it would negative impact upon the detente system.
However, it should be mentioned that the Soviet activists made active use of the Helsinki Accords in widening and strengthening human rights movements at home. In this respective, the Accords is thought to have left positive influence upon the movement. Before the Accords came into being, human rights movement happened in various forms, nationalist, religious and so on. All these different branches of movement were brought into one, the Moscow Helsinki Group, whose shared goal was to demand Moscow to implement the international agreement. Also, the Accords resulted in subdivision of human rights movements into functionally more specific groups.
In conclusion, the Helsinki Accords provided much strengthened moral and legal ground for the Soviet human rights movements. The Accords simply served to verify those values that no society could afford to be exempt from. It overlapped much with what the Soviet activists had persistently claimed for. This is so, in spite of the fact that the Accords was the outcome of political negotiations between the West and East.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 헬싱키 협정 체결 이전의 소련 인권운동
Ⅲ. 헬싱키 협정 체결 이후 〈모스크바 헬싱키 그룹〉의 활동
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
헬싱키 최종협약서와 한반도 적용의 문제 : 인권존중 개념을 중심으로
역사비평
2010 .02
-
Red Capital, Colonial Eyes: Moscow as Seen : by Korean Intellectuals in the 1920s–1930s
Korea Journal
2017 .09
-
인권의 개념
민족연구
2011 .01
-
법의 시각에서 본 인권의 역사
역사비평
2013 .05
-
공간의 문화정치학- 포스트소비에트 시대 모스크바 재건의 문화적 함의 -
슬라브硏究
2006 .01
-
러시아/소련 극동지역 한인이주문제에 대한 정치지리학적 고찰(1860-1937)
슬라브학보
2002 .06
-
한국 인권운동의 토대 형성 : 해방 후부터 1970년대 초까지
역사비평
2013 .05
-
Human Rights in Under-Developed Countries
Korea Journal
1961 .10
-
Korean Studies in the Soviet Union : A Turning Point
Korea Journal
1990 .01
-
Human Rights-Rights of Humanity - Rights of the Earth
신학논단
2004 .06
-
AN INTRODUCTION TO SOVIET KOREAN
어학연구
1987 .06
-
중국특색의 인권정책과 그 함의-보편적 인권개념과의 비교를 중심으로-
철학∙사상∙문화
2018 .01
-
인권과 여성권리의 딜레마 - 여성주의 관점에서 인권 변화에 대한 연구 -
시대와 철학
2019 .01
-
주거권의 경제윤리적 의미
한국기독교신학논총
2013 .01
-
냉전사와 소련 연구
역사비평
2012 .11
-
최초의 고려인 문학선집 『로력자의 고향』에 대한 문화사적 고찰
슬라브학보
2019 .06
-
한국전쟁과 소련의 역할 -1949년 3월 조소 양국 정부의 협상을 중심으로-
대구사학
2010 .01
-
한국 인권영화의 흐름과 경향: 2000년대 인권영화를 중심으로
다문화와 평화
2009 .01
-
후기 러시아 포스트모더니즘 소설과 “모스크바 신화”의 탈신화화
노어노문학
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-003343585