인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
DNA information was frequently used in the area of a disease in the past. However, the DNA information is actively used these days in the area of identity establishment. Some countries including the United Kingdom have established and managed the DNA Date Bank of the criminals. In Korea, since the mid-1990s, the DNA informations of the individuals have been used in the criminal investigation as well as in identifying biological child. The prosecution and the police in Korea felt convenient for the investigation by using the DNA informations. Therefore, the Ministry of Justice submitted the bills on the use of the DNA informations in the investigation to the Congress before.
Last October, the Ministry of Justice submitted again 'the Bill on the Use and Protection of DNA Identity Establishment Information' to the Congress. In this paper, at first, I will survey the background of the submission of the bill and its major contents. Then, I will examine the unconstitutionality of the bill in terms of the infringement of the right of privacy in Art.17, the equality right in Art.11, the double jeopardy in Art.12 Sec.1, the presumed innocence in Art.27 Sec.4, warrants doctrine in Art.12 Sec.3, and the prohibition of guilt-by-association in Art.13 Sec.3 of Korean Constitution. In addition, this paper will examine the problems of DNA database of the criminals in terms of a desirable public policy. Conclusively, this paper will propose an alternative of the bill that has solved the constitutional and public policy problems of the bill.
Last October, the Ministry of Justice submitted again 'the Bill on the Use and Protection of DNA Identity Establishment Information' to the Congress. In this paper, at first, I will survey the background of the submission of the bill and its major contents. Then, I will examine the unconstitutionality of the bill in terms of the infringement of the right of privacy in Art.17, the equality right in Art.11, the double jeopardy in Art.12 Sec.1, the presumed innocence in Art.27 Sec.4, warrants doctrine in Art.12 Sec.3, and the prohibition of guilt-by-association in Art.13 Sec.3 of Korean Constitution. In addition, this paper will examine the problems of DNA database of the criminals in terms of a desirable public policy. Conclusively, this paper will propose an alternative of the bill that has solved the constitutional and public policy problems of the bill.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002943479
