지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
North Korea has survived the era of chain collapse of socialist countries across the world at the end of the 20th century. How is it possible? What are the main pillars buttressing the North Korean regime? Can North Korea change? Or can it be changed? What have been the effects of ROK's North Korean policy so far in changing North Korea, if there are any? Also, What kinds of policy should ROK adopt if it wants to change North Korea in its interests. These are the questions that this research has and tries to answer.
This research defines the desirable directions of North Korean change as follows; politically more democratic, economically more market based, and socially more open. Unfortunately, North Korea lacks in all the major elements which brought forth changes in the traditional socialist countries in Eastern Europe and other areas. North Korean leaders are still struggling in the dilemma between reform and opening on the one hand and regime survival and maintenance on the other. North Korea should have more reformist policies if it wants to escape from its deep rooted economic mires and troubles. But reformist policies would threaten the regime stability and the state integrity. Thus, North Korean leaders are very reluctant in adopting the reformist policies and keep adhering to the so called "self-help" strategies. However, these outdated and pre-modern strategies would not rescue North Korea from its structural economic quagmires. This is a real dilemma for the North Korean regime. ROK's North Korean policy also shows non-effectiveness in changing North Korea. ROK aims for the change of North Korea to become a normal state in international society and, ultimately, the peaceful unification of the Korean peninsula. However, ROK's North Korean policy has been circling between the enforcement and the engagement, depending on the governing party. There has been no middle ground for dealing with North Korea.
Based on all these observations and analysis, this research suggests "Multi Dimensional Engagement toward North Korea" as a way of changing North Korea. The essence of this approach is that ROK should try to engage North Korea in a more multi dimensional and complicated way. It means that ROK should pursue all together recovery and build up of North Korean economy, humanitarian assistance, North Korean version of Perestroika and Glasnost, social integration of North and South Koreans, management of ideological conflicts within ROK and its citizens while continuously making efforts in solving political and military issues with North Korea. North Korean nuclear programs are a real threat to ROK and other countries. However, the change of North Korea will lead to the peaceful solution of these nuclear threats. The multi dimensional engagement would contribute to the change of North Korea.
This research defines the desirable directions of North Korean change as follows; politically more democratic, economically more market based, and socially more open. Unfortunately, North Korea lacks in all the major elements which brought forth changes in the traditional socialist countries in Eastern Europe and other areas. North Korean leaders are still struggling in the dilemma between reform and opening on the one hand and regime survival and maintenance on the other. North Korea should have more reformist policies if it wants to escape from its deep rooted economic mires and troubles. But reformist policies would threaten the regime stability and the state integrity. Thus, North Korean leaders are very reluctant in adopting the reformist policies and keep adhering to the so called "self-help" strategies. However, these outdated and pre-modern strategies would not rescue North Korea from its structural economic quagmires. This is a real dilemma for the North Korean regime. ROK's North Korean policy also shows non-effectiveness in changing North Korea. ROK aims for the change of North Korea to become a normal state in international society and, ultimately, the peaceful unification of the Korean peninsula. However, ROK's North Korean policy has been circling between the enforcement and the engagement, depending on the governing party. There has been no middle ground for dealing with North Korea.
Based on all these observations and analysis, this research suggests "Multi Dimensional Engagement toward North Korea" as a way of changing North Korea. The essence of this approach is that ROK should try to engage North Korea in a more multi dimensional and complicated way. It means that ROK should pursue all together recovery and build up of North Korean economy, humanitarian assistance, North Korean version of Perestroika and Glasnost, social integration of North and South Koreans, management of ideological conflicts within ROK and its citizens while continuously making efforts in solving political and military issues with North Korea. North Korean nuclear programs are a real threat to ROK and other countries. However, the change of North Korea will lead to the peaceful solution of these nuclear threats. The multi dimensional engagement would contribute to the change of North Korea.
목차
제1장 서론
제2장 사회주의 국가의 체제전환 사례
제3장 북한 체제의 변화와 전망
제4장 남북교류 정책의 평가와 과제
제5장 지방자치단체 대북정책의 방향
참고문헌
Abstract
연구요약
머리말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
북한 사회 연구동향과 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
-
북한 주민의 외부 접촉과 대남 인식 변화
아세아연구
2014 .09
-
An Exploratory Study on the Distribution and Marketing Changes Under the North Korean System
산경연구논집
2020 .01
-
북한문제와 한·미관계의 변화
통일정책연구
2006 .01
-
북한자료 공개제도 개선 방안 연구
현대북한연구
2009 .08
-
North Korean Negotiating Behavior : A Comparison of the North-South Korean and North Korea-United States Negotiations
한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .09
-
North Korea Development Report 2002/03
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2003 .12
-
North Korea Development Report 2003/04
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2004 .07
-
中朝关系与中国的朝核政策
국제지역학논총
2009 .12
-
북한 내 “사람값” 담론과 소수자 유형 분류 시도
아세아연구
2015 .03
-
From a Buffer Zone to a Strategic Burden: Evolving Sino-North Korea Relations during Hu Jintao Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2010 .01
-
북한의 외교와 대남정책에 관한 연구 : 성과와 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-002952355