개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, a critical issue in security studies has been revolving around the implications of the comprehensive security which is supposed to encompass economic well-being, society, poverty and environment for the human security conditions. While obscuring the traditional military security in the wake of such changing global trends in the post-Cold War era as globalization, democratization, the expansion of the security concept seems to reflect complicated yet various security issues in the post-Cold War era. Catching up with such changing security realities, many countries are also trying to newly define its national interests and prepare their national security strategy in a rational manner.
In one way or another, these global security changes should affect Korea's security conditions, not to speak of the interests of Gyeonggi -Do, though in its regional sense. Though not escaping yet from the rigid Cold-War confrontation structure, Korea is also in a position to transform its military force structure for meeting the various security demands and challenges dictated by such rapid global security changes.
As this turns out to affect the interests of Gyeonggi-Do in which large scales of military forces have been stationed along with majority of military facility protection areas in Korea, one of it major concerns should be with the impact of these security changes upon the readjustment of its military facility protection areas.
Investigating the validity of this issue, or the readjustment of 'military facility protection area' which accounts for the majority of the Northern border area of Gyeonggi-Do, this study is aimed to explore into the impact of military restructuring due to 'Defense Reform Plan 2020' on the Gyeonggi-Do and find out various policy alternatives conducive to the establishment of the desirable civil-military cooperative relationship.
This study is comprised of four major chapters and policy suggestions as a final chapter: the first one starting with the discussions on the concept of human security contrasted with the traditional military security concept and its implications for national defense reform plan; the second one elaborating the problems of Korea's security conditions affected by the changing Northeast Asian security environment; the third one estimating the regional impact of the USFK redeployment on Pyeongtaek; the fourth one focusing on the plausible impact of military restructuring due to 'Defense Reform 2020' upon the border region of Gyeonnggi-Do, finally ending with the policy alternatives from this research.
As a result, this study suggests some policy alternatives as follows. First, efforts should be doubled to prepare for procedural agreements for the rational solutions between central government concerned with the national interests and regional governments caring for the interests of the border region. Second, regarding the issue of the rational readjustment of the military facility protection, a civil-military coordination center for providing better civil service to the local people should be established in a hurry under the direction of the Joint Staff of Chiefs in the Defense Department. Also needed is the establishment of the civil service consultation for the rapid settlement of civil complaint in regional sectors with the rules stipulating the handling period of the consultation service petitioned by the local people. Third, for the desirable civil-military cooperative relationship, demanded is the revision of the border region-supporting law for the sake of local societies having experienced significant disadvantages and inconveniencies during a long time in the name of national security. Fourth, it is a time for Gyeonggi-Do to initiate and operate the system of "regional cooperation governance" for strengthening its driving capacity by networking various civil societies and NGOs and cooperating with other regions facing the same problems in order to make the central government ant the Korean military act upon its regional interests. Finally, in this sense, needed to be developed further are various policy options for the mutual understanding and common interests by increasing the contacts and interactions between the local people and the USFK bases. Of course, these tasks and alternatives shouldn't be realized over a short period, but provided such demanding security changes and challenges we face in and out the Korean peninsula in the wake of the changing global security environment, our first priority should be given to making and institutionalizing political and legal procedures to balance the military security and the increasing awareness of the citizen's property rights in a democratic way.
In one way or another, these global security changes should affect Korea's security conditions, not to speak of the interests of Gyeonggi -Do, though in its regional sense. Though not escaping yet from the rigid Cold-War confrontation structure, Korea is also in a position to transform its military force structure for meeting the various security demands and challenges dictated by such rapid global security changes.
As this turns out to affect the interests of Gyeonggi-Do in which large scales of military forces have been stationed along with majority of military facility protection areas in Korea, one of it major concerns should be with the impact of these security changes upon the readjustment of its military facility protection areas.
Investigating the validity of this issue, or the readjustment of 'military facility protection area' which accounts for the majority of the Northern border area of Gyeonggi-Do, this study is aimed to explore into the impact of military restructuring due to 'Defense Reform Plan 2020' on the Gyeonggi-Do and find out various policy alternatives conducive to the establishment of the desirable civil-military cooperative relationship.
This study is comprised of four major chapters and policy suggestions as a final chapter: the first one starting with the discussions on the concept of human security contrasted with the traditional military security concept and its implications for national defense reform plan; the second one elaborating the problems of Korea's security conditions affected by the changing Northeast Asian security environment; the third one estimating the regional impact of the USFK redeployment on Pyeongtaek; the fourth one focusing on the plausible impact of military restructuring due to 'Defense Reform 2020' upon the border region of Gyeonnggi-Do, finally ending with the policy alternatives from this research.
As a result, this study suggests some policy alternatives as follows. First, efforts should be doubled to prepare for procedural agreements for the rational solutions between central government concerned with the national interests and regional governments caring for the interests of the border region. Second, regarding the issue of the rational readjustment of the military facility protection, a civil-military coordination center for providing better civil service to the local people should be established in a hurry under the direction of the Joint Staff of Chiefs in the Defense Department. Also needed is the establishment of the civil service consultation for the rapid settlement of civil complaint in regional sectors with the rules stipulating the handling period of the consultation service petitioned by the local people. Third, for the desirable civil-military cooperative relationship, demanded is the revision of the border region-supporting law for the sake of local societies having experienced significant disadvantages and inconveniencies during a long time in the name of national security. Fourth, it is a time for Gyeonggi-Do to initiate and operate the system of "regional cooperation governance" for strengthening its driving capacity by networking various civil societies and NGOs and cooperating with other regions facing the same problems in order to make the central government ant the Korean military act upon its regional interests. Finally, in this sense, needed to be developed further are various policy options for the mutual understanding and common interests by increasing the contacts and interactions between the local people and the USFK bases. Of course, these tasks and alternatives shouldn't be realized over a short period, but provided such demanding security changes and challenges we face in and out the Korean peninsula in the wake of the changing global security environment, our first priority should be given to making and institutionalizing political and legal procedures to balance the military security and the increasing awareness of the citizen's property rights in a democratic way.
목차
제1장 연구배경과 목적
제2장 세계적 안보환경의 변화 추세와 전망
제3장 동북아 안보의 불안정성과 우리의 대응
제4장 한ㆍ미동맹 조정 및 국방개혁의 국내적 영향
제5장 안보환경변화와 경기도 군사시설보호구역의 재조정
제6장 경기도에서의 합리적 민군협력을 위한 정책 제언
참고문헌
Abstract
연구요약
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한반도 안보환경변화와 군사보호구역 재조정 : 경기도 사례
국제정치연구
2010 .06
-
장병정신전력이 군사보안성과에 미치는 영향 연구:군 조직특성과 문화의 매개효과를 중심으로
국방연구
2016 .01
-
Korea's Military Service Policy Issues and Directions for Mid- & Long-term Development
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
-
탈냉전 이후 안보환경의 변화에 따른 신세대 안보인식의 특성
국제관계연구
2007 .09
-
민군관계와 국방리더십의 발전방향
군사학연구
2006 .01
-
한국 국방개혁과 「818계획」의 교훈
군사
2018 .03
-
북한의 민군관계: 군 역할을 중심으로
북한연구학회보
2009 .01
-
America’s New Security Strategy and Its Military Dimension
Global Asia
2012 .12
-
국내주요그룹의 정보보안관리 체계에 관한 사례 연구
경영정보학연구
1998 .01
-
군사안보와 비군사안보의 상관관계
국제정치논총
1998 .02
-
군사기지 및 군사시설보호법의 평가와 과제
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
군과 지역사회 간 상생기반의 군사시설 이전방안- ‘기부 대 양여 사례분석’을 중심으로 -
한국군사학논총
2018 .01
-
Policy-Based Network Security Management Model for Multiple Security Devices
Telecommunications Review
2004 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-002882936