지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.3
- 수록면
- 217 - 248 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Julius Caesar, against our expectation, Caesar seems to be a titular hero, disappearing in the middle of the action of the play. If the other characters did not mention his name so often, his appearance on stage would be felt much shorter. Moreover, his death does not complete the play; rather it is the cause of all that happens after it. But he does not disappear, say, like Duncan who is completely forgotten after his death. The Roman people cry "Let him be Caesar" even when one of his killers, Brutus, explains why he had to get rid of him. For them Brutus is another Caesar. Caesar always already lives in other characters.
In fact, everybody in the play can be called another Caesar in that they do just as Caesar did to get what they want. In the Lupercal which first introduces to the audience the birth of Caesarism, Caesar refuses the coronet Antony presents because he perceives that the people don't want him to be king. His refusal, however, does not mean that he gives up becoming king. Rather it means that he strategically chooses to show himself a man determined not to become a king against the wish of his people, a pose that he is a being who puts public good above anything else. Behind this pose lurks his ambition that even if he actually cannot be a king in the Republican Rome, he will remain a symbolic being which is above all kings, a demi-god. Consequently, while Caesar makes all kings think it honoured to be called Caesar though he himself could not actually become a king by his death, he remains subject to his pose. This is not just Caesar's way; it is like a structure permeated in the ways the other characters, including the mob, adopt for different purposes, whether they be ones to support or overthrow Caesar. All the other characters are another Caesar in that sense; they are the agents of Caesarism which once made Caesar say "I am always Caesar."
In fact, everybody in the play can be called another Caesar in that they do just as Caesar did to get what they want. In the Lupercal which first introduces to the audience the birth of Caesarism, Caesar refuses the coronet Antony presents because he perceives that the people don't want him to be king. His refusal, however, does not mean that he gives up becoming king. Rather it means that he strategically chooses to show himself a man determined not to become a king against the wish of his people, a pose that he is a being who puts public good above anything else. Behind this pose lurks his ambition that even if he actually cannot be a king in the Republican Rome, he will remain a symbolic being which is above all kings, a demi-god. Consequently, while Caesar makes all kings think it honoured to be called Caesar though he himself could not actually become a king by his death, he remains subject to his pose. This is not just Caesar's way; it is like a structure permeated in the ways the other characters, including the mob, adopt for different purposes, whether they be ones to support or overthrow Caesar. All the other characters are another Caesar in that sense; they are the agents of Caesarism which once made Caesar say "I am always Caesar."
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 ‘위기의 사회’
고전 르네상스 영문학
2011 .01
-
정의 구현과 치유의 상관관계: Julius Caesar와 Caesar Must Die 비교 연구
고전 르네상스 영문학
2014 .01
-
줄리어스 시이저의 이중적 자아 이미지
영어영문학
2016 .05
-
『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 설득 기술
영어영문학연구
2011 .01
-
셰익스피어와 정치적 정의: 『줄리어스 시저』를 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
Julius Caesar에서 WILL과 SHALL
신영어영문학
1994 .02
-
『줄리어스 시이저』에 나타난 브루터스의 정치적 실천전략의 부재
영어영문학
2018 .02
-
초기 경력을 통해서 본 포풀라레스 지도자 카이사르
역사와 담론
2005 .09
-
『줄리어스 시저』의 프로이드적 읽기 : 원시부족과 그룹정치
Shakespeare Review
2015 .12
-
셰익스피어『줄리어스 시저』에 나타난 ‘차이’와 ‘반복’의 양상
Shakespeare Review
2014 .09
-
수사학과 Julius Caesar
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
영국 근대초기 줄리어스 시저의 수용에 관한 고찰 ―셰익스피어의 『줄리어스 시저』와 시저의 『갈리아 전기』를 중심으로―
영국 연구
2010 .01
-
Julius Caesar 에 있어서의 소재변용
Shakespeare Review
1986 .08
-
『시이저와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 시이저의 인간적 차원의 위대성 탐색
신영어영문학
2010 .11
-
합리적 개인주의 : 『줄리어스 시저』와 『햄릿』에 나타난 주체 형성하기
동서비교문학저널
2018 .09
-
인간을 변화시키는 힘: Caesar Must Die 연구
영어영문학연구
2014 .01
-
『줄리어스 시저』: 힘에의 의지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .06
-
테오도르 몸젠의 자유주의 문제와 역사교육 : 율리우스 카이사르 관련 서술을 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .03
-
The Aspect of the Stoic Elements in Julius Caesar
영어영문학
2007 .06
-
「줄리어스 시저」에 나타난 정신에 대해서
Shakespeare Review
2012 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003101749