메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Young-il Oh (서울여자대학교)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.10 Number.3
발행연도
2010.9
수록면
671 - 698 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A grammaticality judgment questionnaire of 48 test sentences and 24 fillers was given to 22 native English speakers to investigate if there is an empirical evidence for or against the argument-adjunct asymmetry. Wh-phrases with different grammatical relations (subjects, objects, and adjuncts) were extracted from the five different clauses (subject clauses, that-clauses, wh-clauses, adjunct clauses, and complex noun clauses). Statistical analyses revealed that in long wh-movement, there was no statistically significant difference between objects and adjuncts while a significant difference existed between subjects and non-subjects. With respect to the object (and adjunct) extractions, moreover, there was a significant difference across the five different clauses; there was a clausal hierarchy of grammaticality in extraction (that-clauses 〉〉 wh-clauses, adjunct clauses, complex noun clauses 〉〉 subject clauses). These results suggest the possibilities that 1) unlike the traditional assumption of argument-adjunct asymmetry, there might be no actual asymmetry between arguments, specifically objects, and adjuncts. Consequently, two explanatory tools (Subjacency and ECP) involving the grammaticality difference in the generative grammar may need to be reconsidered. And 2) the clausal hierarchy proposed in relation to the extraction of objects (and adjuncts) from a variety of clauses may have implications for the status of islands: subject clauses as strong islands, that-clauses as non-islands, and the other three as weak islands.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Conclusion and Discussion
References
Appendix. Questionnaire

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-740-003656755