지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine how ‘morpheme’ has been used in describing Korean language. In Korean phonology, ‘morpheme’ is frequently needed to describe phonological phenomena. When underlying forms are determined, they deal with morphemes. But we do not need morphemes to determine underlying forms by synchronic phonological rules because they become similar to syntactic atoms. Phonology can be concretely related to syntax.
Although we understand morphology as a branch to generate words from morphemes, we do not need to rely on the concept of ‘morpheme’. Sometimes it becomes an obstacle to understand morphological phenomena and classification of morphemes is mixed with word classes. Both Stem and root are not morphemes. Even though affixes and endings correspond to morphemes, we do not need the word ‘concept’ for them as we do not need it for stems and roots.
Syntax does not need the concept of ‘morpheme’ because it deals with syntactic units. But it has been used in syntactic description for the reason that JO-SAs(case markers and delimiters) and endings correspond to morphemes. But, in syntax, it does not necessary to use the word ‘morpheme’ because it is possible to analyse some JO-SAs and endings to more than two morphemes.
Korean orthography relies on the concept ‘morpheme’. A morpheme should be written as a single form in principle. If a morpheme has irregular allomorphs, they are written as themselves. But the rules of Korean orthography do not include the word ‘morpheme’. They do not state definitely about how to write morphemes when they have more than two syllables. Therefore some dictionary writes affixes by syllables as if they consist of two units. If they are composed of two morphemes, we have affixes with two morphemes.
As discussed so far, the concept have some problems. Therefore some students, especially middle schools students have difficulty in understanding it. We suggest that the concept ‘morpheme’ should be restricted to analyze from the theoretical and grammar educational viewpoint.
Although we understand morphology as a branch to generate words from morphemes, we do not need to rely on the concept of ‘morpheme’. Sometimes it becomes an obstacle to understand morphological phenomena and classification of morphemes is mixed with word classes. Both Stem and root are not morphemes. Even though affixes and endings correspond to morphemes, we do not need the word ‘concept’ for them as we do not need it for stems and roots.
Syntax does not need the concept of ‘morpheme’ because it deals with syntactic units. But it has been used in syntactic description for the reason that JO-SAs(case markers and delimiters) and endings correspond to morphemes. But, in syntax, it does not necessary to use the word ‘morpheme’ because it is possible to analyse some JO-SAs and endings to more than two morphemes.
Korean orthography relies on the concept ‘morpheme’. A morpheme should be written as a single form in principle. If a morpheme has irregular allomorphs, they are written as themselves. But the rules of Korean orthography do not include the word ‘morpheme’. They do not state definitely about how to write morphemes when they have more than two syllables. Therefore some dictionary writes affixes by syllables as if they consist of two units. If they are composed of two morphemes, we have affixes with two morphemes.
As discussed so far, the concept have some problems. Therefore some students, especially middle schools students have difficulty in understanding it. We suggest that the concept ‘morpheme’ should be restricted to analyze from the theoretical and grammar educational viewpoint.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 음운론과 형태소
3. 형태론과 형태소
4. 통사론과 형태소
5. 어문규범과 형태소
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
언어학과 국어학 : 변형 생성 문법과 한국어 어미의 통사론
동서인문학
2016 .12
-
형태소(Morpheme)의 변이 형태소(Allomorph)로의 분석
한글
1962 .05
-
A Special Status of the Morpheme-initail [h]in Korean
언어과학
2005 .01
-
'이-' 후행 형태소의 문법 범주 - '나'와 '거나'를 중심으로 -
어문학
2005 .09
-
음성 실현형 ‘–슴미–’와기저 구조 ‘–습–느–니––’
언어와 정보사회
2017 .01
-
Korean EFL Learners’ Development of Inflectional Morphemes
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
The Stem Transposition Effects in Korean Word Recognition
언어과학
2019 .01
-
On morpheme order : A generalized alignment perspective
음성음운형태론연구
2006 .12
-
한국어 다기능 형태소의 교수？학습 방법 연구
이중언어학
2007 .01
-
한국어 문법 단위의 변화 유형에 대하여
한국사상과 문화
2005 .01
-
The Syntax of Pragmatic Morphemes in Korean
언어
1994 .06
-
중국어 형태소와 낱말의 의미 관계
중국어문학논집
1999 .08
-
‘-군-’(한군데)의 형태소 정립을 위한 시론 : 방언은 이에 어떻게 기여하는가?
우리말글
2007 .04
-
현대 중국어 형태소(morpheme)의 명칭, 정의문제
중국어문학논집
2003 .05
-
세대에 따른 구례 방언 문법 형태의 변화
국어문학
2017 .07
-
‘한글 맞춤법’의 원칙 및 원리에 대한 재고찰
어문학
2020 .03
-
15세기 국어 표기의 단위와 특성
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2004 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-810-003643464