메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국성인간호학회 성인간호학회지 성인간호학회지 제18권 5호
발행연도
2006.12
수록면
746 - 759 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study was designed to systematically explore and elicit information about terminally ill cancer patients' and primary family caregivers' subjectivity of death. Method: Using Q-methodology, 21 terminally ill cancer patients and 19 primary family caregivers sorted 40 statements during personal interviews. Results: The results of this study show that terminally ill cancer patients have four factors (‘Attachment to life’, ‘Hope for heaven’, ‘Resignation to reality’, ‘Avoidance of pain’) of response and primary caregivers have four factors(‘Dependence on religion’, ‘Faithfulness to reality’, ‘Obedience to fate’, ‘Agony of reality’). Comparing the subjectivities of death of terminally ill cancer patients and primary family caregivers, ‘Hope for heaven’ and ‘Dependence on religion’ reveal the similarities of their outlook. On the other hand, ‘Attachment to life’, ‘Resignation to reality’, ‘Avoidance of pain’, ‘Faithfulness to reality’, ‘Obedience to fate’, ‘Agony of reality’ reveals different aspects of their outlook. The group of terminally ill cancer patients and their families divided into four types. Type A was ‘Attachment to life and Agony of reality’, type B was ‘Attachment to life and Obedience to fate’, type C was ‘Hope for heaven and Dependence on religion’ and type D was ‘Resignation to reality and Faithfulness to reality’. The positive group was C or ‘Hope for heaven and Dependence on religion’. Conclusion: There are significant differences found in the subjective structure of death among terminally ill cancer patients and primary family caregivers. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an individualized nursing intervention for terminally ill cancer patients and family caregivers.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
References
Abstract

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-512-003977515