인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
There are five major issues in the capital punishment debate : the argument that capital punishment acts as a deterrent, the retribution argument, the arbitrariness argument, the danger of mistake argument, the incapacition argument.
Of course there are other less important issues such as cost efficiency argument, community protection argument, appeal to public opinion argument, crual and unusual argument, brutality argument etc.
The most serious sentence imposed by national and international criminal courts is the death penalty. Often thought no longer civilized penalty in the whole world, the death penalty is gaining popularity at an increasing rate. Over 70% of the korean people have an pro attitude toward the so cruel punishment. Yet for the state to take a life especially of murderers, such action must be theoretically and domatically justified. The justification and excuse of the death penalty had been hotly debated. Proponents argue that capital punishment plays key role as a deterrent for the individual as well as for other potential murderers.
Really many people accentuate that capital punishment is the only satisfactory retribution that society can gain for such a heinous act as premeditated murder. Opponents argue that such sentences are not effective for deterring murder. Sentences are imposed arbitrarily, often based on the wealth of the victim or murderers. Such a mistake justifies of the elimination of the death penalty. Finally they pointed out that all of the empirical on the subject failed to prove death penalty acts as a deterrent. Other minor issues must be examined.
Of course there are other less important issues such as cost efficiency argument, community protection argument, appeal to public opinion argument, crual and unusual argument, brutality argument etc.
The most serious sentence imposed by national and international criminal courts is the death penalty. Often thought no longer civilized penalty in the whole world, the death penalty is gaining popularity at an increasing rate. Over 70% of the korean people have an pro attitude toward the so cruel punishment. Yet for the state to take a life especially of murderers, such action must be theoretically and domatically justified. The justification and excuse of the death penalty had been hotly debated. Proponents argue that capital punishment plays key role as a deterrent for the individual as well as for other potential murderers.
Really many people accentuate that capital punishment is the only satisfactory retribution that society can gain for such a heinous act as premeditated murder. Opponents argue that such sentences are not effective for deterring murder. Sentences are imposed arbitrarily, often based on the wealth of the victim or murderers. Such a mistake justifies of the elimination of the death penalty. Finally they pointed out that all of the empirical on the subject failed to prove death penalty acts as a deterrent. Other minor issues must be examined.
#사형존치론
#사형폐지론
#흉악범억제효과
#보복의 필요
#오판 가능성
#자의적 판단
#무해화
#proponent and opponent of the death penalty
#deterrent
#retribution
#arbitrainess
#danger of mistake
#incapacitation
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 현재의 상황
- Ⅱ. 일본의 사형제도논의
- Ⅲ. 미국의 사형제도
- Ⅳ. 미국대법원 판례분석
- Ⅴ. 사형제도를 둘러 싼 쟁점들
- Ⅵ. 소결
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968245