인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Recently, there has been an increase in administrative litigations involving the request for compensation to former pro-democracy activists in Korea, and in this case, the main problem posed is which lawsuit to file. In other words, when a person asserting himself as one of the victims of pro-democracy movement demands the administrative agency to pay compensation and the request is not accepted, it is debatable whether he should file a revocation suit on the refusal against the agency or a suit against the state directly, demanding a reasonable sum of money in compensation.
This article focuses on the examination on how the Supreme Court of Korea and administrative lower court in Korea deal with this problem and some issues arising from each type of lawsuit. In addition this article suggests solutions thereto from the practical point of view.
In conclusion, it entirely depends on what is the core dispute with compensation whether a plaintiff files a revocation suit against the administrative agency or a compensation suit against the state. When the agency refuses to accept the request for compensation on the ground that it can not recognize the claimant to be qualified for compensation, the plaintiff should file a suit against the agency for revocation of the refusal. On the contrary, when a qualified person is not satisfied with the amount of compensation allotted by the agency, the plaintiff should file a suit against the state for increase in the compensation.
This article focuses on the examination on how the Supreme Court of Korea and administrative lower court in Korea deal with this problem and some issues arising from each type of lawsuit. In addition this article suggests solutions thereto from the practical point of view.
In conclusion, it entirely depends on what is the core dispute with compensation whether a plaintiff files a revocation suit against the administrative agency or a compensation suit against the state. When the agency refuses to accept the request for compensation on the ground that it can not recognize the claimant to be qualified for compensation, the plaintiff should file a suit against the agency for revocation of the refusal. On the contrary, when a qualified person is not satisfied with the amount of compensation allotted by the agency, the plaintiff should file a suit against the state for increase in the compensation.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-363-003958242
