Recently the issue whether so called anti human rights crime or concealing, manipulating the evidence of these acts by government agencies could be the object of nonpunishment by reason for prescription of prosecution in criminal procedure law, is taking growing interest. The legislator as well as the NGO and the public are calling upon the government making the special law ruling out application of the current provision.
The prescription of prosecution in current criminal system have the positive rolls and contribute to the legal stability. On the other hand, it is also true that it causes the unfair in the criminal charges and result in the distrust of the public. The most important thing in this thesis is not just abolishing of the institution like this prescription of prosecution, but how the justice could be restored.
In this connection, here the research results are following
Firstly, those acts like the torture and murder by government agencies are anti human rights, so the appropriate measures against those acts have to be taken. Just for the reason of prescription of prosecution those acts couldn't be remained nonpunishment.
Secondly, the crimes as the object of exclusion of the prescription of prosecution must be made clearance. This includes the anti human rights crimes by government agencies and anti humanity crimes, for example war crime and massacre etc.
Thirdly, recently our government ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, so we need the performance law legislation followed by ratifing the Rom Statue. In this connection it could be better not reform of criminal procedure law as legislatory form, but unifing both the performance law legislation and special law for exclusion the prescription of prosecution.