인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
It is nearly five years since the Government Employees Union Act was enacted and enforced in Korea. Despite of the expectation and interest of many people, unfortunately, it seems that the labor relations between the government employees unions and the government are recently conflicting since the present government has been officially launched. The reason seems to be that the Government Employees Union Act was insufficient to guarantee the government employees' basic labor rights and/or the present government is implementing the policies to exclude the government employees unions.
Because the Act prohibits many government employees, for example, the discharged government employees and the managerial officials from joining the labor union, restricts excessively the matters to bargain collectively for their unions, and bans entirely the collective action of union, there are many limits to what the government employees union can organize the government employees and bargain with the government in substance.
And, since the present government has been officially launched, the government departments, i.e. the Ministry of Pubic Administration and Security and the Ministry of Labor restricted repeatedly to organize and to join the union, canceled the establishment of labor union and the collective agreements by reason of the violation of the Act. Also the Court and the Constitutional Court recognized mostly the measures or decisions of the governments departments on the reason that the National Assembly and the government department should have discretion in the legislation and its enforcement.
In conclusion, in order to guarantee sufficiently the freedom of association and the right to organize expression of the government employees, the Act should be amended with no limits to what they might fully organize and join the union, and bargain collectively and take collective action for themselves and their members.
Because the Act prohibits many government employees, for example, the discharged government employees and the managerial officials from joining the labor union, restricts excessively the matters to bargain collectively for their unions, and bans entirely the collective action of union, there are many limits to what the government employees union can organize the government employees and bargain with the government in substance.
And, since the present government has been officially launched, the government departments, i.e. the Ministry of Pubic Administration and Security and the Ministry of Labor restricted repeatedly to organize and to join the union, canceled the establishment of labor union and the collective agreements by reason of the violation of the Act. Also the Court and the Constitutional Court recognized mostly the measures or decisions of the governments departments on the reason that the National Assembly and the government department should have discretion in the legislation and its enforcement.
In conclusion, in order to guarantee sufficiently the freedom of association and the right to organize expression of the government employees, the Act should be amended with no limits to what they might fully organize and join the union, and bargain collectively and take collective action for themselves and their members.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-336-003793517
