지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.1
- 수록면
- 557 - 567 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are some differences between governmental reforms by the new managerial ism and the modern managerial ism, while these two movements have some similar aspects. New managerialism over decades has emphasized the 'supply-side efficiency' like search for efficiency, consumerism, quality and other market values at the expense of democratic accountability. However, 'modernizing government movement'. since the Labor party dominated in 2000, emphasized the new values like joined-up government, best value, public involvement, although succeeding results-based management reforms, in order to enhance political accountability and representative democracy. Thus, there are different approaches on the government accountability between these two paradigms. This research compares commons and differences between these two paradigms from the experience of Korean government reform since 1980s, and explores critically the way to coordinate the search for the outcome or efficiency and democratic accountability, otherwise, in conflict.
목차
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
NPM REFORMS AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN PUBLIC SECTOR
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACCOUNTABILITY AND DEMOCRACY
ANALYSIS ON THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT REFORM
FURTHER RESEARCH QUESTIONS
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-350-004017241