인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Chin-O Yu, the architect of South Korea's form of government, reserved some constituent parts of the parliamentary system and named them “the elements from the parliamentary system” in the face of the miscarriage of his plan for introducing the parliamentary constitution. He expected the presidential system to be operated like the parliamentary system for the future. But the constitutional reality was diametrically opposed. The prime minister system which is the core element of the parliamentary government has been misused as a bulletproof cabinet supporting a authoritative president. Because of many unsolved problems of the presidential system in South Korea, there have been some attempts to pay attention to the reserved elements of the parliamentary system and revalue them for developing the appropriate form of government. However, even if some elements which are foreign to a specific model of the presidential system exist and they are called “the elements from parliamentary system”, there is no guarantee that running the government like the parliamentary system will be possible. From a objective point of view, without Chin-O Yu's layout, in the present Constitution there are only a few elements which can be revalued as the elements from the parliamentary system. They should be reevaluated as the means of separation of powers. The presidential system, although it has the principle of division, allows the mutual control between the government and the parliament. The name of “the elements from the parliamentary system” should be discarded, and the element's value as checks and balances should be reestablished. It is desirable that the elements which have a negative effect on the presidential system be removed. Today, the root problem of an imperial president can be attributed to not the structure of the presidential system or the constitutional authority of the president but the surrounding system (e.g. the party system and the electoral system), the peripheral institution (e.g. the court, the prosecutor's office and the media) or the political culture. Without solving this fundamental matter, there is little point in the alteration of the form of government or the rational management of government.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-360-004409207
