지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.2
- 수록면
- 343 - 371 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corruption perceptions measures that are based on public opinion survey with sophisticated sampling methods, have been widely used in field of corruption studies over decades as proxies for the state of corruption. Past research however has failed to distinguish the difference between the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist in public mind and the degree of corruption in a society. Further they tended to underestimate the importance of response variations about corruption perceptions in survey research with the political, economic, and institutional environment controlled. What makes survey respondents perceive the same state of corruption differently and can we find any patterns of their perception in terms of socio-economic characteristics? This article improves our understanding of these questions by exploring factors upon the degree to which corruption is perceived to each respondent. This article constructs an empirical model to test the effects of respondents' socio-economic characteristics and corruption perception about specific policy arena on the general perception of corruption in a society. Using a couple of corruption surveys in 2004 and 2006 and a ordered logistic regression method, this article finds that a respondent's age, job, education, income factors influence how his general perception of corruption is shaped. The younger a respondent is, she is more likely to evaluate the state of corruption negatively. Those who are rich tend to be more insensitive to the state of corruption. Also, a respondent's evaluation on tax and civil engineering and construction administration influence have strong impact on the degree to which corruption is perceived to him while the effects of those on police, education, and court are rather minimal.
To emphasize the potential harm caused by sampling bias, we conduct a semi-experiment using a series of Korean Public Administration Research Institute Corruption studies. Our result shows that changes in aggregate public corruption scores could be due either to changes in societal corruption or to sampling errors in respective surveys. Our findings warn that corruption measures based on public polls should be carefully utilized in terms of its potential for inaccuracy.
To emphasize the potential harm caused by sampling bias, we conduct a semi-experiment using a series of Korean Public Administration Research Institute Corruption studies. Our result shows that changes in aggregate public corruption scores could be due either to changes in societal corruption or to sampling errors in respective surveys. Our findings warn that corruption measures based on public polls should be carefully utilized in terms of its potential for inaccuracy.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 부패인식지수와 그 한계
Ⅲ. 시민의 부패인식의 차이에 대한 실증적 분석
Ⅳ. 회귀분석의 결과와 그 함의
Ⅴ. 맺으며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
사회의 부패수준 및 관행에 대한 개인의 인식이 부패의향에 미치는 영향 : 공공기관 납품업체 종사자를 대상으로
고길곤
,
이보라
한국사회와 행정연구
2012
.11
공무원 부정부패의 원인과 현황에 대한 실증적 분석
김철식
공공사회연구
2012
.02
공직사회의 사회자본이 부패에 미치는 영향 : 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로
전오진
,
남상화
한국정책과학학회보
2009
.09
부패의 사회적 원인에 대한 국가 간 비교 연구 : 범죄사회학적 관점에서
신동준
형사정책연구
2013
.12
부패행위에 대한 제도적 통제
최순영
,
최진욱
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-350-004220713