지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The pronoun ‘geunom’ basically has the function of lowering the status of a man. In the Southwestern dialect, however, it is also used to refer objects, the resulting consequence of which is the overlapping of function with the already existing demonstrative pronoun ‘geugeot.’ Also in the Southwestern dialect, the bound noun ‘nom’ can be used to refer objects and thus the overlapping of function occurs with the preexisting ‘geut’ which is also used to refer objects. Which brings us to the question of how the two expressions-‘nom’ and ‘geot,’ ‘geunom’ and ‘geugeot’-are differentiated in their usage in the Southwestern dialect where both expressions can be used for the same function. This paper starts with this question.
The bound noun ‘nom’ occurs in relative constructions, but in the Southern dialects it can even occur in some of the complement constructions, which marks the difference with other dialects in which ‘nom’ does not occur in complement constructions.
Also ‘nom’ has the restriction of not being able to occur in such structures that are used to indicate possessions, such as ‘human noun + possessive particle.’ On the other hand, ‘nom’ is used more specifically than ‘geot’ and is a situation-dependent expression. Likewise, because ‘geunom’ can be used as a more specific and subjective pronoun than ‘geugeot,’ it can be used to indicate more concrete situation. On this account, ‘geugeot’ is used instead of ‘geunom’ in relatively objective situations such as when presenting a new name for something, when objective predicate is used, or when referring to an object already mentioned by the other speaker. Also, in situations that tend to be conservative to changes, such as the idiomatic construction, the more traditional expression of ‘geot’ or ‘geugeot’ is used instead of ‘nom’ or ‘geunom’ which has undergone change of meaning.
The bound noun ‘nom’ occurs in relative constructions, but in the Southern dialects it can even occur in some of the complement constructions, which marks the difference with other dialects in which ‘nom’ does not occur in complement constructions.
Also ‘nom’ has the restriction of not being able to occur in such structures that are used to indicate possessions, such as ‘human noun + possessive particle.’ On the other hand, ‘nom’ is used more specifically than ‘geot’ and is a situation-dependent expression. Likewise, because ‘geunom’ can be used as a more specific and subjective pronoun than ‘geugeot,’ it can be used to indicate more concrete situation. On this account, ‘geugeot’ is used instead of ‘geunom’ in relatively objective situations such as when presenting a new name for something, when objective predicate is used, or when referring to an object already mentioned by the other speaker. Also, in situations that tend to be conservative to changes, such as the idiomatic construction, the more traditional expression of ‘geot’ or ‘geugeot’ is used instead of ‘nom’ or ‘geunom’ which has undergone change of meaning.
목차
1. 서론
2. 의존명사 ‘놈’
3. 대명사 ‘그놈’
4. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-701-004493013