메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(서울과학기술대학교)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第46卷 第2號
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    Anas and Rhee (2006)["Curbing Excess Sprawl with Congestion Tolls and Urban Boundaries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 510-541] claim that the urban growth boundary (UGB) reduces welfare no matter how small it may be. They set the opportunity cost of land to zero, and consequently they ignored the opportunity cost of land saved by the UGB. Because of this omission, their evaluation of the UGB's welfare impact was biased downward. I present a method of how we may reflect the land cost in the computable general equilibrium model and show that the UGB may not be absolutely harmful when the opportunity cost of land is duly considered. When the land cost is considered, negative welfare impacts of the UGB are cut by 60% of their original estimation. Even in this case, however, the overall conclusion is that the UGB is still very ineffective as a policy instrument cubing the excess sprawl.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-539-000583409