지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I think that the task of this article is explaining ’the mind of the colonists’ in terms of historiography of Korea from the viewpoints of ’mental history’.
This paper describes not the history of research of Korean history. but discourses representing the character of scholarship(hakji. 學知) in Korea in 1950~60s.
Description of Korean Historiography in Japan at that time. has been positively received that it denied discriminatory images about Korea. both in Korea and Japan until today. But Ⅰ pointed in this paper. that Korean historiography in Japan then couldn’t help holding the two limits, First. Most of historian of Korean history had been continuing research from colonial era. and they helped to construct Japan’s Korean History in post World War Ⅱ period, Second. Younger historians. such as Hatada Takashi, criticized Korean historiography formated in Modern Japan, and wrote some articles on it. But it wasn’t able to contain historiography by Korean intellectuals under colonial era.
We have to pay attention to the fact that such limits has been not solved until today in Japan.
This paper describes not the history of research of Korean history. but discourses representing the character of scholarship(hakji. 學知) in Korea in 1950~60s.
Description of Korean Historiography in Japan at that time. has been positively received that it denied discriminatory images about Korea. both in Korea and Japan until today. But Ⅰ pointed in this paper. that Korean historiography in Japan then couldn’t help holding the two limits, First. Most of historian of Korean history had been continuing research from colonial era. and they helped to construct Japan’s Korean History in post World War Ⅱ period, Second. Younger historians. such as Hatada Takashi, criticized Korean historiography formated in Modern Japan, and wrote some articles on it. But it wasn’t able to contain historiography by Korean intellectuals under colonial era.
We have to pay attention to the fact that such limits has been not solved until today in Japan.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. ‘전후 조선사학’의 기반
Ⅱ. 아카데미즘 조선사학의 기반: ‘계승’이라는 과제
Ⅲ. 역사를 말하는 주체라는 문제: 조선인 부재의 사학사
Ⅳ. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000565830