메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
곽관훈 (선문대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제33집
발행연도
2011.2
수록면
631 - 650 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the case of the hostile M&A, target company tries to protect the M&A so as to maintain the independence of a target company. In this time, therefore, it is common for the target company to employ various defensive measures. Major defensive measures available to a target company include poison pill, lock-up, and so on. But, it is impossible that the target company has prepare defensive measures of hostile M&A in Korea. Because the Corporate Act in Korea has been not permitted to introduce defensive measures for hostile M&A.
The past decade has witnessed extraordinary growth in the assets held by institutional investors, specially pension funds. Institutional investors have both greater incentives to intervene in management than the individual shareholder, and that intervention by them is much more practicable. Therefore, institutional investors, specially pension funds, have a great role to improve of corporate governance in our markets. For this reason, expectation role of shareholder has been changed.
It is important that the shareholder of target company has prepare defensive measures of hostile M&A. Therefore our corporate law should permit for shareholder to introduce defensive measures for hostile M&A. In this article, I would like to explore the expectation role of shareholder, and then necessity to introduce defensive measures for hostile M&A.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기업가치보고서를 통해 본 주주역할
Ⅲ. 적대적 M&A과정에서 주주역할 제고
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000490397