인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
Full-text
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
초록·키워드
Self-plagiarism is the ambiguous and difficult term. Even scholars may confuse it with plagiarism. Plagiarism, as defined in the 1999 Black’s Law Dictionary 7th ed., is the act or an instance of copying or stealing another’s words or ideas and attributing them as one’s own. In contrast to plagiarism, according to Wikipedia, self-plagiarism is the reuse of significant, identical, or nearly identical portions of one’s own work without acknowledging that one is doing so or without citing the original work. In principle self-plagiarism is not so much a question of legal or moral issue in journalism as a question of research integrity within academia. Nonetheless, each time a person from academia was nominated for a high government post, self-plagiarism questions were raised not by the academia, but by the media. With the result that the nominated person’s “self-plagiarism” issue was sensationally reported in the press without fact confirmation, it was misused or abused dependent upon factional interest or affiliation. The misuse of self-plagiarism issue might have an adverse effect on the social integration. The misuse of self-plagiarism issue on the basis of factional interest serves as a cautionary tale of how our academia paid too little attention to it. Before the indiscriminate use of self-plagiarism issue, it is worth establishing the objective standard concerning self-plagiarism. Establishment of the objective standard regarding self-plagiarism is academia’s urgent task.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the academic arguments of self-plagiarism and establish the substantial standard of self-plagiarism The paper is divided into four parts. The first part is introduction. It provides emerging problems by means of the misuses of self-plagiarism. The second part outlines the meaning and contents of self-plagiarism by examining the terminological origin and making a distinction among self-plagiarism, plagiarism and copyright infringement. Also, the second part examines the existing arguments pertaining to self-plagiarism of other countries, for example, Japan, Germany and U.S. and considers the issues and cases surrounding it in Korean society. The third part emphasizes the primary role of a democratic civil society in the controversy and misunderstanding surrounding self-plagiarism. Finally, this paper concludes with some ways to avoid self-plagiarism.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the academic arguments of self-plagiarism and establish the substantial standard of self-plagiarism The paper is divided into four parts. The first part is introduction. It provides emerging problems by means of the misuses of self-plagiarism. The second part outlines the meaning and contents of self-plagiarism by examining the terminological origin and making a distinction among self-plagiarism, plagiarism and copyright infringement. Also, the second part examines the existing arguments pertaining to self-plagiarism of other countries, for example, Japan, Germany and U.S. and considers the issues and cases surrounding it in Korean society. The third part emphasizes the primary role of a democratic civil society in the controversy and misunderstanding surrounding self-plagiarism. Finally, this paper concludes with some ways to avoid self-plagiarism.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498080
