메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(대전대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제27집
발행연도
수록면
273 - 286 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

A lottery purchaser spent the money on an instant lottery and the lot fell upon him. But he heard that the undertaking bank could not take him the lottery jackpot. It was a reason that a winning number was discordant between a lottery purchase’s number and a undertaking bank’s number. A verification number has been used for a confirmation of lottery. The lottery jackpot could be paid if a number is of one accord with the three(a lottery purchase’s number, a undertaking bank’s number, a lottery Agency’s number).
A lottery purchaser makes definitionally a demand the lottery jackpot from a undertaking bank when he won in the lottery. In this case, a precedent requests that a undertaking bank as a third party must check on a winning number. But it is contrary to ordinary people’s common idea that ordinary people demand immediately the lottery jackpot in checking winning. And a meaning of flaw that is noted with an agreement, is a external flaw. That is to say, a rules about a lottery Agency’s printing mistake bear no relation to a winning number. In addition, the pay standard of the lottery jackpot is a internal rules for paying the lottery jackpot. It is not a ground for the rejection of the lottery jackpot.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Ⅰ. 들어가며
  2. Ⅱ. 복권의 개념
  3. Ⅲ. 당첨금지급의 법률관계
  4. Ⅳ. 마치며
  5. 참고문헌
  6. Abstract

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498646