메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정철 (한국학중앙연구원)
저널정보
고려사학회 한국사학보 韓國史學報 제44호
발행연도
2011.8
수록면
271 - 304 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Kim Yuk (金堉, 1580~1658) played a major role in enacting the Taedongp?p (大同法), meaning the Uniform Land Tax Law, which is known to have been the most important financial reform in Chosen Korea. Many scholars have paid special attention to Kim’s idea and produced a number of papers purporting that his reform proposal exemplified pragmatism. Some scholars have even attempted to associate the ideology behind his reform with that of early sirhak(實學), literally meaning Practical Learning, in that both stood separately from the Confucian mindset. Existing studies on Kim Yuk, however, neglect to consider the fact that Kim was not merely a theorist but a high-ranking government official. Kim, rather than a stubborn idealist who clung to his idea per se, was a bureaucrat in charge of the fiscal affairs of the state. Indeed, he sought political compromise. Existing studies also have simply assumed that pragmatism or practicality stands opposite of Confucianism. interpreting sirhak as a new intellectual trend transcending Confucianism. In fact, however, the practicality found within Kim’s reform idea was not his own: it derived from earlier reformers like Yi I (李珥, 1536-1584), one of the paragons of the leading Confucian scholar-officials of the Chos?n dynasty. Focusing on those two points, this paper critically examines the nature of Kim Yuk’s reform proposal and contends that sirhak was a school of Confucianism.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 현실 인식 방식
3. 정치관
4. 정책관
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000693066