지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Soseki is representative novelist and theorists of Japanese modern literature, and Lee Gwangsoo (Lee) is known as person who opened doors to Korean modern literature. They are representing not only Korean and Japanese modern literature, but also Oriental modern literature. We focused on the early stages of their literary theories. As well, looked into their arguments based on their ideas of literary education in relation between literature and society.
Although Soseki and Lee are both representatives of Korean and Japanese modern literature, we have found their literary theories to have contrasts, as well as undertoned ideal substance. Their findings show identical recognition in defining the workings of human mind as intellect, emotion and volition. Also, their thoughts on the realm of emotion is the characteristic of literature, and explained modern literature by drawing the concepts of rationality and truth.
Soseki insisted literary art is not a simple skill; a literary artist could influence others due to their ideals that a literary artist is someone who has the biggest and highest ideals. Lee’s argument resembles Soseki’s argument. Lee contended literary art can be made simply with skill and endeavor. Only highly gifted artist can take charge of a growing self-regulating person who could lead society through literature.
Soseki and Lee both, therefore, conclude the Occidental natural science (in other words, education that is logical and substantiate) is modern education, and upcoming Oriental new education need to take after. We found Soseki and Lee have contended education through literature that could produce self-regulating and liberal individuals based on the mentioned Occidental new education.
Although Soseki and Lee are both representatives of Korean and Japanese modern literature, we have found their literary theories to have contrasts, as well as undertoned ideal substance. Their findings show identical recognition in defining the workings of human mind as intellect, emotion and volition. Also, their thoughts on the realm of emotion is the characteristic of literature, and explained modern literature by drawing the concepts of rationality and truth.
Soseki insisted literary art is not a simple skill; a literary artist could influence others due to their ideals that a literary artist is someone who has the biggest and highest ideals. Lee’s argument resembles Soseki’s argument. Lee contended literary art can be made simply with skill and endeavor. Only highly gifted artist can take charge of a growing self-regulating person who could lead society through literature.
Soseki and Lee both, therefore, conclude the Occidental natural science (in other words, education that is logical and substantiate) is modern education, and upcoming Oriental new education need to take after. We found Soseki and Lee have contended education through literature that could produce self-regulating and liberal individuals based on the mentioned Occidental new education.
목차
1. 한ㆍ일 두 근대 지식인의 문학과의 조우
2. 선행연구
3. 『문학론』과 「문학이란 하오?」 비교
4. 문학교육과 근대
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 가라타니 고진 / 1997 / 일본 근대문학의 기원 / 민음사 : 19 ~ 23
2. [단행본] - 권혁건 / 2007 / 나쓰메 소세키 생애와 작품 / 고려대학교 출판부 : 18 ~
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권혁건 / 2008 / 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)와 이광수(李光洙)의 유학체험 비교연구 / 동북아 문화연구 1 (14) : 47 ~ 65
4. [단행본] - 이광수 / 1968 / 今日 我韓靑年과 情育, In 이광수 전집 1 / 삼중당 : 475 ~
5. [단행본] - 이광수 / 1968 / 문학이란 하오, In 이광수 전집 1 / 삼중당 : 507 ~ 509
2. [단행본] - 권혁건 / 2007 / 나쓰메 소세키 생애와 작품 / 고려대학교 출판부 : 18 ~
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권혁건 / 2008 / 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)와 이광수(李光洙)의 유학체험 비교연구 / 동북아 문화연구 1 (14) : 47 ~ 65
4. [단행본] - 이광수 / 1968 / 今日 我韓靑年과 情育, In 이광수 전집 1 / 삼중당 : 475 ~
5. [단행본] - 이광수 / 1968 / 문학이란 하오, In 이광수 전집 1 / 삼중당 : 507 ~ 509
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
죄의식, 원한, 근대성 : 소세키와 이광수
서영채
한국현대문학연구
2011
.12
나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의『그 후(それから)』와 이광수의『무정(無情)』에 나타난 근대적 개인의 형성 과정과 성격 비교 연구
김언정
일본문화연구
2011
.07
신세기 루쉰(魯迅) 논쟁 연구 : 이데올로기 정전에서 문화 컨텍스트로
朴英順
,
黃靖惠
중국어문학논집
2014
.02
메이지 시대와 도덕관 : 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의 『도련님(坊っちゃん)』에서 ‘선생’을 중심으로
석정희
아시아문화연구
2013
.06
이광수 소설에 나타난 ‘인격’과 그 주체 표상 : 『흙』을 중심으로
이철호
동악어문학
2011
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000794158