인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The movement against the abolishment of the electric cars" outskirts line, which continued during 1932 and 1933, was a local movement originated from the outskirts area of the Gyeongseong-bu. This movement was based upon the dual structure of the Gyeongseong area and also the interests of the majority of the local residents, and continued for quite some time. The movement also involved, albeit partially, a nationalist agenda, and therefore was supported by the Joseon community as well. The movement proceeded in the most typical fashion we can observe from the Japanese occupation period. The issues were originated from the local resident leaders" meetings, then further discussed in conferences between representatives of Dong - Ri units, and then a movement community was organized to raise money and propagate their issues, and such efforts eventually resulted in the commencement of resident campaigns and submission of appeals. This movement was a rare success compared to other movements that were attempted under the colonial ruling. Although the movement featured one big flaw of having the colonial authorities involve themselves in the movement, the local movement itself was another opportunity of forming a public consensus nonetheless.
And the concept suggested for the cause of the movement was "public interest". At the time, terms like "public interest" or public matter" meant "the interest of the majority", and in local movements, these terms meant the "common interest of the local residents". Electric cars were public assets that were usually used by all the members of local communities, so such assets always had the potential to generate a region-wide issue of common interest regardless of social classes or nationalities. In case of this electric car issue, "safety and conveniences", protection of existing rights", local developments" were raised as reasons why such movement was necessary. And compared to this public interest" in the issue involving electric cars, the private(私) interest was known to be represented by a civilian company named the Gyeongseong Electricity corporation. There was a social perceptive that civilian companies in charge of public-natured businesses were required to serve public interests even such serving would limit the companies" pursuit of private interests or their excercise of property rights.
The movement was led by local influentials, and also the collaborators of the colonial authorities. They maintained their cause of public interest while also holding onto their private profits, and the cause of "local development" was what made that possible. This local development" cause was a social and economical basis which legitimatized the concept of collaborating with the colonial ruling, and the public"s being assimilated into the occupation system.
And the concept suggested for the cause of the movement was "public interest". At the time, terms like "public interest" or public matter" meant "the interest of the majority", and in local movements, these terms meant the "common interest of the local residents". Electric cars were public assets that were usually used by all the members of local communities, so such assets always had the potential to generate a region-wide issue of common interest regardless of social classes or nationalities. In case of this electric car issue, "safety and conveniences", protection of existing rights", local developments" were raised as reasons why such movement was necessary. And compared to this public interest" in the issue involving electric cars, the private(私) interest was known to be represented by a civilian company named the Gyeongseong Electricity corporation. There was a social perceptive that civilian companies in charge of public-natured businesses were required to serve public interests even such serving would limit the companies" pursuit of private interests or their excercise of property rights.
The movement was led by local influentials, and also the collaborators of the colonial authorities. They maintained their cause of public interest while also holding onto their private profits, and the cause of "local development" was what made that possible. This local development" cause was a social and economical basis which legitimatized the concept of collaborating with the colonial ruling, and the public"s being assimilated into the occupation system.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000992182
