메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임용한 (충북대학교)
저널정보
역사실학회 역사와실학 歷史와實學 第46輯
발행연도
2011.11
수록면
41 - 70 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Chosun’s Defense strategy was based on peace of Northeast Asia By Ming(明) Dynasty. But In 1449, it happened that YoungJong(英宗) was captured by Oirat. And It was not long before the word came from China that Oirat might invade Chosun. It made Chosun frightened. Because Chosun’s Defense strategy was suited to fortify the border. There was no preparations for invasion.
King Munjong(文宗) and His officials made two plan. The 1st plan construct fortress to stand in enemy’s way, and repaired castles in cities[郡縣]. The next plan was mobilization of troops from the South.
Both was good in plan, but there were serious problems in real. There were little fortress, and almost castles were weak. Therefore cannot help abandon 70% cities in order to reduce defense-line in maximum.
Mobilized soldiers were not trained capable to war. Many soldiers effort to avoid mobilization order. Sureong(守令) could not draft because list of soldier was not in Sureong but in government to pretend revolt.
For the sake of protect more cities, ascending troop’s ability, Reformation was needed. Especially, every city had to rise their self - defense ability. But this directly opposed on traditional military policy that government should exclusively possess all military factors.
This strategary needs and conflicts give support to Jingwan-system(鎭管體制).

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 토목의 변과 조선의 대응
Ⅲ. 국토방어전략과 문제점
Ⅳ. 동원체제와 전면전 대응태세의 한계
Ⅴ. 결론 - 국방체제 개혁의 과제와 진관체제
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-001341998