인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
This paper focuses on the concept of desire and its dilemma in the philosophy of G. Deleuze and F. Guattari.
They criticize the perspective of desire as a lack and propose that the desire could play a positive role without being determined by a certain end. In their view, the "producing" desires can be free from the passive position guided through pleasure and pain and the mechanism of oppression through the criteria of good and evil. However, in spite of their critique of teleology, one cannot deny that they themselves have an aim to overcome the established social order supported by the ideology of "Oedipus". Moreover, they have to encounter with the dilemma of desire, since the oppression of desire is driven too, by a sort of desire.
To solve this problem, Deleuze and Guattari change the agent of desire, from the "desiring machine" to the "body without organ". But they should pay for it the cost of the attenuation of the meaning of desire. Such a result, I think, comes from their neglect of other, the object of desire.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지They criticize the perspective of desire as a lack and propose that the desire could play a positive role without being determined by a certain end. In their view, the "producing" desires can be free from the passive position guided through pleasure and pain and the mechanism of oppression through the criteria of good and evil. However, in spite of their critique of teleology, one cannot deny that they themselves have an aim to overcome the established social order supported by the ideology of "Oedipus". Moreover, they have to encounter with the dilemma of desire, since the oppression of desire is driven too, by a sort of desire.
To solve this problem, Deleuze and Guattari change the agent of desire, from the "desiring machine" to the "body without organ". But they should pay for it the cost of the attenuation of the meaning of desire. Such a result, I think, comes from their neglect of other, the object of desire.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 목적론과 욕망
- 2. 생산하는 욕망
- 3. 오이디푸스와 욕망의 억압
- 4. 욕망의 딜레마와 ‘기관 없는 신체’
- 5. 타자를 향한 욕망
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
