메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
히로코 이케가미 (고베대학교)
저널정보
현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 현대미술사연구 제30집
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
233 - 249 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Who represents contemporary Japanese art today? The first name that comes to anyone’s mind would be Murakami Takashi, who held a successful solo show at the Palaces Versailles in 2010 and also holds the record price by a living Japanese artist with his signature work My Lonesome Cowboy (1998) having sold for $15.2 million in 2007 at Sotheby’s New York. In addition, Murakami’s gift as a curator was widely acknowledged when he organized for New York’s Japan Society in 2005 Little Boy: The Arts of Japan’s Exploding Subculture , which received an award of the “Best Thematic Museum Show in New York” from AICA USA, an American section of International Association of Art Critics. This paper examines this “triumph” of Japanese Neo-Pop in a historical perspective, by comparing Little Boy to the exhibition entitled The New Japanese Painting and Sculpture, the first large-scale exhibition of Japanese contemporary art in the United States, organized and traveled by the Museum of Modern Art, New York in 1965-67.
Despite the great distance of four-decades that separates Little Boy and The New Japanese Painting and Sculpture, it is helpful to compare the two exhibitions in terms of agency and discourse, asking such questions as “Who organized the exhibition?” and “What kind of narrative was created for the exhibit?” While the lack of these two ingredients marked The New Japanese Painting and Sculpture a critical failure, Murakami had a clear agenda regarding what to show and how to narrate his exhibit. The two exhibitions are also historically connected through the patronage of John D. Rockefeller 3rd, who promoted cultural exchange between the U.S. and Japan after World War Ⅱ. While he revived the Japan Society as its president after WWⅡ, his namesake foundation, The JDR 3rd Fund, supported The New Japanese Painting and Sculpture and funded Asia Cultural Council, from which Murakami received a grant to spend one year in New York in 1994-95.
This connection points to another important issue in this paper: that is, the presence of America in postwar Japan. If such Anti-Art artists as Shinohara Ushio and Kojima Nobuaki dealt with this question in the 1960s, Murakami differently engaged the same question in the 2000s. With a well-planned discursive strategy, Murakami succeeded in establishing a narrative of Japanese contemporary art and culture that did not depend upon Euro-American models of modernism, through a joint labor with Alexandra Munroe, the then director of Japan Society Gallery who commissioned him to curate Little Boy. However, that narrative was based on his nationalistic historical determinism and narrative of victimhood based on Japan’s experience of two atomic bombs and defeat of World War Ⅱ, which could undermine the actual diversity of Japanese contemporary art. As will be demonstrated with the case of Teruya Y?.ken, how the “U.S. problems” in postwar Japan is confronted varies from one artist to another within each generation. Through this historical analysis, this paper will present the “triumph” of Japanese Neo-Pop as an ambivalent legacy for the future generation of Japanese artists.

목차

서론
1. 《새로운 일본 회화와 조각》전, 1965-67
2. 《리틀 보이》전 이전의 역사
3. 《리틀 보이》전:무라카미의 큐레이터로서의 전략과 광범위한 전략
4. “미국”에 대한 비 팝 참여: 테루야 유켄
Bibliography
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-609-001267514