지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper presents a method to evaluate redundancy in 33 Air Pollution Monitoring Stations (APMS) during 2007 and 2008 at Seoul Metropolitan Area by comparing daily average concentrations of one station to the other among APMS for the cases of air pollutant NO₂, SO₂, and O₃. The criteria to be tested for redundancy are as follows: 1) to check if two stations are within 3㎞ distance, 2) by one-way ANOVA, to test whether the air pollution levels from the different station are statistically different, 3) by paired comparisons, to test whether the mean difference is significantly different from zero, 4) by estimating a simple linear regression model, to figure out whether the concentration level of one station is considered as being statistically equal to that of the other at any day.
The results show that no redundancy has been detected in daily average concentrations of both NO₂ and SO₂ during the two years. However, in the case of concentrations, Beon-dong and Banghak-dong station are identified to be possibly redundant since the test result gives the following conditions: 1) distance criterion is met between the two stations, 2) there is a statistical indication that the means of the concentrations at the two stations are equal, and 3) there is a strong evidence that the concentration of one station is able to be predicted by the other. Therefore, the two stations can be recommended to remove one station or to move one station to a new location so that they may cover two exclusive areas.
The results show that no redundancy has been detected in daily average concentrations of both NO₂ and SO₂ during the two years. However, in the case of concentrations, Beon-dong and Banghak-dong station are identified to be possibly redundant since the test result gives the following conditions: 1) distance criterion is met between the two stations, 2) there is a statistical indication that the means of the concentrations at the two stations are equal, and 3) there is a strong evidence that the concentration of one station is able to be predicted by the other. Therefore, the two stations can be recommended to remove one station or to move one station to a new location so that they may cover two exclusive areas.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행 연구
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 분석 결과
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
2. [보고서] - 김운수 / 2000 / 서울시 대기오염 자동측정망의 적정입지 및 관리운영체계
6. [학위논문] - 유영숙 / 1996 / 서울시 오존측정망의 중복성 고찰과 대기중 오존농도에 대한 배출원의 영향확인 / 석사 / 건국대학교
8. [보고서] - 이화운 / 2006 / 부산지역 대기오염측정소의 위치 적정성 평가
9. [보고서] - 전미경 / 1998 / 경기도 대기오염 측정망의 적정성 개선방안 연구
10. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 전의찬 / 1996 / 대기오염도 실측에 의한 대기오염 자동측정망의 대표성 평가 5 (1) : 79 ~ 86
6. [학위논문] - 유영숙 / 1996 / 서울시 오존측정망의 중복성 고찰과 대기중 오존농도에 대한 배출원의 영향확인 / 석사 / 건국대학교
8. [보고서] - 이화운 / 2006 / 부산지역 대기오염측정소의 위치 적정성 평가
9. [보고서] - 전미경 / 1998 / 경기도 대기오염 측정망의 적정성 개선방안 연구
10. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 전의찬 / 1996 / 대기오염도 실측에 의한 대기오염 자동측정망의 대표성 평가 5 (1) : 79 ~ 86
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-359-001268850