지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Draft Common Frame of Reference is the academic work, prepared by two research groups at the delegation of the European commission, containing principles, definitions and model rules of European private law. This impressive work is not only significant in the realm of European private law, but also in the context of Korean private law as well, which has constantly been influenced by European private law. Although it is good to be acquainted with the contents of the DCFR, it is equally important to understand where DCFR stands in the past, present, and the future of European private law. For some years, DCFR has been the focus of huge controversy in various aspects. Its relationship to the idea of the European Civil Code, the solidness of the common legal infrastructure of the European private law on which it stands, and its position as to the fundamental values of the private law have especially been subject to fierce controversy. Apart from the debate concerning these issues, the European Union is pressing forward with the next idea of “Instrument of the European Contract Law”, based on the contract law part of the DCFR, which will significantly affect the future of the European Contract law. Anyhow, DCFR will be remembered as a huge leap in the road to the integration of European private law. The contract law part is likely to serve as the meaningful stepping stone to the integration of European contract law, while the other parts are likely to remain as a mere academic work that might benefit future efforts in its kind. A close observation on the process of making DCFR and the controversy that followed also gives us some implications that we need to dwell on. Among these implications, I have argued that expansion of the role of the comparative analysis, competition between legal regimes, and the emerging significance of the fundamental values of private law are particularly noteworthy.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. DCFR 개관
Ⅲ. DCFR을 둘러싼 논쟁
Ⅳ. 유럽계약법 도구(Instrument of European Contract Law)로의 이행
Ⅴ. 시사점
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
유럽공통매매법 제안(CESL(p))과 우리 민법 : 계약해석기준조항과 관련하여
장병일
법학연구
2014
.06
판례를 통하여 본 유럽공동체법과 개별회원국법의 적용우선순위에 관한 고찰
정성숙
법학연구
2007
.11
동아시아가치 논쟁과 한국민주주의의 과제
박호성
정치사상연구
2001
.04
혼인과 이혼의 법경제학
윤진수
법경제학연구
2012
.06
相續回復請求權의 消滅時效에 관한 舊慣習의 違憲 與否 및 判例의 遡及效 : 대법원 2003. 7. 24. 선고 2001다48781 전원합의체 판결(公2003하, 1785)
윤진수
비교사법
2004
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270477