지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Yi Hyos?k understands D. H. Lawrence as an English writer who writes about the relationship between humans and nonhumans in the ecocritical assessment. In Women in Love (1920), Lawrence designs an ecological theme by using animals and examines the relationship between human beings and a rabbit in chapter eighteen “Rabbit.” The rabbit helps develop the love relationship between two main characters while the rabbit is being beaten by them.
Like Lawrence, a colonial Korean writer Yi thematizes the relationship between human beings and nature in his essays, short stories, and novels. As Lawrence portrays the love relationship negotiated by the rabbit Bismarck in Women in Love, Yi describes the love relationship between the colonial Korean man Ch’?n Ilma and the Russian woman Nadia developed by the horse Achilles in Endless Blue Sky (1941). Ch’?n alone bets on the horse Achilles and wins a game, which helps Ch’?n liberate Nadia from her work in the cabaret, and he brings her to colonial Korea.
In this paper, I examine how each writer describes different animals in Women in Love and Endless Blue Sky based on ecocriticism. I am concerned with the issue of “pathetic fallacy” as to how each writer succeeds in limiting humane emotions to the animal description. The relationship between human beings and the rabbit Bismarck and between human beings and the horse Achilles needs to be examined to uncover the meaning of otherness in animals.
Like Lawrence, a colonial Korean writer Yi thematizes the relationship between human beings and nature in his essays, short stories, and novels. As Lawrence portrays the love relationship negotiated by the rabbit Bismarck in Women in Love, Yi describes the love relationship between the colonial Korean man Ch’?n Ilma and the Russian woman Nadia developed by the horse Achilles in Endless Blue Sky (1941). Ch’?n alone bets on the horse Achilles and wins a game, which helps Ch’?n liberate Nadia from her work in the cabaret, and he brings her to colonial Korea.
In this paper, I examine how each writer describes different animals in Women in Love and Endless Blue Sky based on ecocriticism. I am concerned with the issue of “pathetic fallacy” as to how each writer succeeds in limiting humane emotions to the animal description. The relationship between human beings and the rabbit Bismarck and between human beings and the horse Achilles needs to be examined to uncover the meaning of otherness in animals.
목차
1. 인간과 동물 사이의 경계
2. 타자로서의 동물
3. 인간중심주의(Anthropomorphism)와 감정의 오류(Pathetic Fallacy)
4. 나가며
〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『사랑하는 여인들』 : 기계적 재생산과 예술의 충돌
김경현
신영어영문학
2017
.11
‘보편’에 다가가는 수단으로서의 ‘식민지인 되기’ : 이효석의 <녹색탑>을 중심으로
배상미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2014
.12
1920년대 후반 식민지 문학에 나타난 ‘북국(北國)’ 표상 연구 : 이효석 초기 작품과 카프 관련 활동을 중심으로
이현주
우리문학연구
2014
.10
일제 말 이효석과 유진오의 도시 읽기 : 「하얼빈」과 「신경」을 중심으로
이양숙
한국현대문학연구
2014
.08
이효석론 : 「메밀꽃 필 무렵」을 중심으로
간복균
문예운동
2013
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-001307914