지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the Jeju naval base construction controversy from the viewpoint of the institutional discursive approach and to review other controversial cases in order to generalize institutional discursive theory. The findings are as follows: First, the internal and situational conditions such as the historical and cultural traditions of the conservational and peaceful island had an effect on the controversy. Second, the unpredictable and unfair institutions for development also affected the controversy. Third, the policy approaches of the government and the navy were one-sided without deliberation and authentic discourse. which led to the failure of consensus-building between the developers and the conservationists. Fourth, mediation and arbitration were not used for resolution of the controversy, but three litigation cases are proceeding. Finally, the study attempts to generalize the institutional discursive approach through comparisons to cases both at home and abroad.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 제주 강정마을 해군기지 분쟁사례의 분석
Ⅳ. 분석결과의 종합과 논의의 확장
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-350-001581142