메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김춘순 (국회예산정책처) 문지은 (국회예산정책처)
저널정보
서울행정학회 한국사회와 행정연구 한국사회와 행정연구 제22권 제4호
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
237 - 263 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of involving the legislative branch in the budget process is to promote good governance, control the executive’s power. and improve the efficiency of fiscal management. The legislative arm should work to approve the budget, laws, and oversee the executive. The requirement for legislative approval of financial measures is a democratic foundation stone that is enshrined in Constitutions around the world. Though the exact role and capacity may differ, each legislature has budgetary powers from the Organic budget law or Constitution. While case studies have been conducted on budget institutions, few have included quantitative measures or compared legislative budget institutions. This study constructs a legislative budget institution index, using the 2007ㆍ2008 OECD and World Bank survey of budget practices and procedures database, for the purpose of cross-national comparison and explaining differences. The index, constructed using the methods of Wehner and Alesina et al., arranges 48 countries according to two-sub indices: financial power and organization capacity. The results reveal the United States, with its presidential system, to have the highest scores. Sweden, which has experience of budgetary and financial reform has the second highest score. On the other hand, England, Ireland, and Canada, which operate under the Westminster-system have low scores. Government system is found to have a significant impact on the legislative budget institution index, whether OECD membership is controlled for or not. Similarly, the financial power index is found to be significant, but the organization capacity index has less impact.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 검토
Ⅲ. 의회예산제도지수 비교분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈부록〉

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-350-001581233