인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
Some Korean laws allow dissenting shareholders to have appraisal rights, by which shareholders opposing to a resolution of the board of directors can claim to the company for the purchase of their shares after the date of special resolution of general shareholders’ meeting. Dissenting shareholders have their appraisal right only about the company acts which significantly affect the company’s business mostly under Commercial Act, Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act, and Act on the Structural Improvement of the Financial Industry.
Legal discussions about the dissenting shareholders’ appraisal right have been focused both on its legal character and more sharply on the issue of fair purchase price. Last year, the Korean Supreme Court ruled not only on fundamental legal character of shareholders’ appraisal rights surrounding delayed payment for share by the company but also on computing method of LISTED shares for the first time in addition to its existent decisions about non-listed shares. However, the latter decision may bring some troubles to the minority dissenting shareholders. Interest conflicts may exist even in this process of calculating fair purchase price of shares. Therefore, this paper aims to review the Supreme Court’s decisions, to indicate their problems and to suggest some remedial measures focused on fair dealing.
Legal discussions about the dissenting shareholders’ appraisal right have been focused both on its legal character and more sharply on the issue of fair purchase price. Last year, the Korean Supreme Court ruled not only on fundamental legal character of shareholders’ appraisal rights surrounding delayed payment for share by the company but also on computing method of LISTED shares for the first time in addition to its existent decisions about non-listed shares. However, the latter decision may bring some troubles to the minority dissenting shareholders. Interest conflicts may exist even in this process of calculating fair purchase price of shares. Therefore, this paper aims to review the Supreme Court’s decisions, to indicate their problems and to suggest some remedial measures focused on fair dealing.
#주식매수청구권
#반대주주
#시장가격
#주식매수가격(가액)
#공정가격
#공정절차
#Appraisal Right
#Dissenting Shareholders
#Market Price
#Share Purchase Price
#Fair Price
#Fair Dealing
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 머리말
- Ⅱ. 주식매수청구제도의 일반
- Ⅲ. 주식매수가격의 산정기준
- Ⅳ. 맺음말
- 參考文獻
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-366-001746778
