지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 『Samguk sagj(三國史記)』’s 「Geography section(地理志)」, all the Gun-hyeon units’ origins are clarified, and in the beginning of every entry, there is a mention saying ‘originally Goguryeo’ or ‘originally Baekje’ or ‘originally Shilja.’ Examined in this article, are such categorization of all the units in the Geography section, and all the discrepancies confirmed.
Their categorization into the Three Dynasties was not an accurate reflecUon of the borders among the three ancient dynasties at any given time point, but was a mere mathematical representation of ‘three Ju(州) provinces per dynasty.’ which demonstrates the compilers’ perception of the past at the time they were engaged in creating the Geography section of 『Samguk sagj』.
In the early days of the Coryeo dynasty, the area north of the Samgak san mountain was considered as the old Goguryeo territory, and the area below the Han gang river was believed as the old territory of Baekje. The ‘Nine Ju provinces’ were allocated to the ‘Three dynasties’ in an equal fashion because the people of the time considered those 9 provinces as the symbol of Shilla’ unification of the three ancient kingdoms. But there were other records inside as well, which do not always correspond with such belief.
Their categorization into the Three Dynasties was not an accurate reflecUon of the borders among the three ancient dynasties at any given time point, but was a mere mathematical representation of ‘three Ju(州) provinces per dynasty.’ which demonstrates the compilers’ perception of the past at the time they were engaged in creating the Geography section of 『Samguk sagj』.
In the early days of the Coryeo dynasty, the area north of the Samgak san mountain was considered as the old Goguryeo territory, and the area below the Han gang river was believed as the old territory of Baekje. The ‘Nine Ju provinces’ were allocated to the ‘Three dynasties’ in an equal fashion because the people of the time considered those 9 provinces as the symbol of Shilla’ unification of the three ancient kingdoms. But there were other records inside as well, which do not always correspond with such belief.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 三國 分屬의 기준 검토
3. 三國 分屬의 자료간 불일치
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『三國史記』地理志의 기준 시점과 연혁 오류
윤경진
한국사연구
2012
.03
『三國史記』本紀에 나타난 靺鞨의 性格
金鎭光
고구려발해연구
2009
.11
삼국사기를 통해 본 한국 고대의 자연재해와 가뭄주기
윤순옥
,
황상일
대한지리학회지
2009
.09
『삼국사기』의 천문오행지적 재구성 시안 : 『증보문헌비고』 「상위고」 체제를 참고하여
김일권
고구려발해연구
2012
.11
『三國史記』「屋舍」條에서 室의 해석에 관한 연구 : 新羅王京(皇龍寺址東便S1E1地區)遺跡과 문헌해석을 중심으로
이정미
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2011
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002860449