메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김영녀 (인천대학교) 김영구 (인천대학교) 오현택 (인천대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제21권 제2호 (인문·사회과학편)
발행연도
2012.4
수록면
15 - 25 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to consider the academic characteristics of "Consilience" and examine its applicability to integration of sport science. Dispute between segmentation and integration of sport science was behind the rise of Consilience in sport science. The theory of Consilience was a product of reductionism by examination a critical review the concept of Consilience in the academic world, and therefore the concept of Consilience that had been in common use in sport science was used for a wrong purpose. Based on the above discussion, it was expected that the Consilience of sport science would have a lot controversial points both sides of theory and practice. Consilience had a theoretical defect that didn"t acknowledge the differences in basic hypothesis through making knowledge between disciplines. In practical side of sport science, there was a grade of ranks between disciplines that interfered with the equal interchange and integration of sport science, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies in sport science for the foundation of Consilience were rare, and interdisciplinary research system itself had a lot of difficulties to put in practice. The matters claiming prior settlement for serious discussion about Consilience in sport science as follows: first, the comprehensive and systematic plan for Consilience would be necessary, second, the philosophical foundation for the necessity of academical integration would be prepared, third, journals and academic council would be extended for interdisciplinary research, and forth, the balanced development of all disciplines in sport science would be pursed for long-term development of interdisciplinary research.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 체육학에서 통섭 개념의 대두와 적용
Ⅲ. 통섭 이념에 대한 학계의 비판과 체육학의 오해
Ⅳ. 체육학에서의 통섭 가능성
Ⅴ. 결론: 체육학의 통섭을 위한 방향
참고문헌

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0